Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: whistleduck

> Those that complete a minimum of 20 years, and those that have on-going service connected disabilities should be the priority.

What about those already retired — in their 70s, 80s, and older, with retirement incomes below the poverty level — who can’t afford to pay the supplemental insurance payments for Medicare? They retired with the understanding that they had enough to subsist, if not to live in comfort. Now, at an age when they have little chance of working to support themselves, do you support dumping them into the rest of the indigent population, in many instances causing them to lose their homes or not be able to pay rent, in effect, putting them on the street?

“Sorry, veterans, we changed our minds. ‘Thank you for your service’ and all that, but you old bastards need to get off your duffs and earn a living!”


40 posted on 12/22/2016 5:15:05 PM PST by GJones2 (Reducing care for veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: GJones2

As a 4 year peace time vet, I wouldn’t even think of walking into a VA hospital with an ailment.
Yes, I believe the VA should be for 20 yr retirees and combat injured.
I wouldn’t have the audacity to think I could even enter that building.
Sorry, but that’s just me.


41 posted on 12/22/2016 5:34:30 PM PST by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson