Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Lucky

2A is a right that all are entitled to.
And if there are armed people here, then a discussion about the merits, demerits, theory, and usage of our respective tools will be had.
The right of self defense is universal and absolute.
That was one of the things the founders said.
Now, how about a discussion about intent?
If they are here for nefarious purposes, then they aren’t under the “defense” banner. Are they?


22 posted on 12/09/2016 7:02:52 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare

I’m sorry, but the right to bear arms has never been recognized to allow some one to carry on private property over the objections of the property owner.


24 posted on 12/09/2016 7:08:56 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson