2A is a right that all are entitled to.
And if there are armed people here, then a discussion about the merits, demerits, theory, and usage of our respective tools will be had.
The right of self defense is universal and absolute.
That was one of the things the founders said.
Now, how about a discussion about intent?
If they are here for nefarious purposes, then they aren’t under the “defense” banner. Are they?
I’m sorry, but the right to bear arms has never been recognized to allow some one to carry on private property over the objections of the property owner.