Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeperCell

“(Is this why the mainstream media’s coverage of Trump was fairly positive up until his nomination ... and then universally negative after?)”

I have now heard that line for months. And my challenge is for anyone to submit an example, on video or audio, of when the press treated Trump fairly positively.

I watched the whole whole campaign closely, and the coverage of Trump always began with a sardonic smear, and ended the same way.

Drudge offered up a sample the other day.


39 posted on 11/16/2016 6:03:09 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: odawg
I watched the whole whole campaign closely, and the coverage of Trump always began with a sardonic smear, and ended the same way.

Showtime has a series on now, "The Circus", that covered the entire campaign from the beginning of the primaries to the election.

I never heard _one_ nice thing about Trump from any of the analysts or commentators, not _one_ word.

The highlight of the series, btw, was on election night, about 10:30PM or so, at Hillary HQ, when they see Donna Brazile and asked her "What do you know about Michigan" and Donna responded quickly "Detroit, Flint, low turnout".

FR vindicated!
47 posted on 11/17/2016 2:52:57 AM PST by cgbg (Pedophiles--the siren is wailing--incoming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson