Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
She’s retired.

She can do what she wants...except...violate her agreement to protect classified information.

Not true.

If she is excepting pay from the DoD (e.g. a retirement check) then she is still accountable to the UCMJ, which includes the prohibition against indicating official DoD (she's in uniform) support, or rejection, of a political candidate.

Further, as a retiree, she would be entitled to wear her uniform at appropriate functions...this does NOT include bashing a political candidate. She risks losing pay and allowances if not other punitive measures.

Outside of uniform and without indications the DoD is supporting her.....entirely different story.

24 posted on 11/07/2016 2:28:53 PM PST by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy saints surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Repeat Offender

Prove it. I’m retired and never heard such a thing. Also, if you recall, Scoyus rejected the stolen valor laws. People can dress as they wish.


29 posted on 11/07/2016 2:55:28 PM PST by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Repeat Offender

I call BS. Prove me wrong and post the UCMJ regulations. I will apologize if I am wrong but I don’t think I am.


33 posted on 11/07/2016 2:58:28 PM PST by castowell (War is thus an act of force to compel our enemy to do our will - Von Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson