Posted on 10/20/2016 10:33:42 AM PDT by MichCapCon
Michigan’s major cities — which have been among the most violent in the nation in recent years — saw a major drop in crime last year. Generally speaking, it is the safest time in decades to live in Michigan.
The FBI recently released the 2015 edition of its annual report, “Crime in the United States.” The report is a compilation of data that law enforcement agencies around the country voluntarily submit to FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR).
According to the UCR website, 18,000 city, university, county, state, tribal and federal law enforcement agencies participate in the program, which has been collecting and publishing crime statistics since 1930.
The UCR collects data on “index” offenses, which are major crimes that include murder and some forms of manslaughter, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, arson and auto theft.
The FBI reports that, after two years of decline, the national rate of violent crime increased 3.9 percent in 2015, compared to 2014. Property crimes dropped for the thirteenth consecutive year, however, declining by 2.6 percent.
Although they still have some of the highest crime rates for large cities, Detroit and Flint experienced double-digit drops in their rates of violent crime in 2015: 13 and 14 percent, respectively. Other Michigan cities of 50,000 or more residents were among the safest in the country: Rochester had the sixth-lowest violent crime rate, and Novi was 25th. The violent crime rate for the state fell by 3 percent.
This new information directly contradicts the mistaken refrain that crime is high in Michigan and on the rise. Rather, the state achieved a double-digit drop in Detroit and Flint crime rates even as prisons continued to close. (The Department of Corrections has closed or consolidated 25 facilities in the last ten years).
These trends are consistent with findings from a 2014 University of Michigan study, which finds that putting people in prison isn’t always the best solution for reducing crime. Economist Michael Mueller-Smith studied court records from Harris County, Texas, where Houston is located, to examine the effects of prison on the lives of offenders. He concluded that the benefits of incarcerating someone could be offset in the long run by increasing the likelihood that he will commit another crime after being released.
Mueller-Smith observed that each additional year spent in prison increased the odds that a prisoner would reoffend by 5.6 percent each quarter. He also noted that more time in prison increased the odds that low-level offenders would go on to commit more serious crimes after their release.
Michigan, which in 2009 had the longest average prison term of any state, stands to lose a lot by over-incarcerating our offenders. We undermine our society when we cut off offenders from their responsibilities to their families and the stability of a job. We incur large social and financial costs of additional crimes when ex-offenders recidivate. And then we add to our $2 billion-plus annual corrections bill by re-imprisoning inmates whose initial stay probably ensured that they would eventually return.
We cannot accept corrections policies that create more crime. Polling by Pew Charitable Trusts revealed that more than 80 percent of people whose families endured a crime agree with the following statement: “It does not matter whether a nonviolent offender is in prison for 18 or 24 or 30 months. What really matters is that the system does a better job of making sure that when an offender does get out, he is less likely to commit another crime.”
Economists, advocates for offenders and even victims agree: Reviewing our sentencing and release policies is a critical step towards ensuring we continue to increase our public safety and economic well-being.
Put the drug abusers on an island. Give them all the drugs they want. Problem solved.
This study sounds flawed. Maybe there is a correlation between the severity of the initial crime (and hence sentence length) and the propensity to err again.
Dear Michigan,
Three Strikes works.
Put the drug abusers on an island. Give them all the drugs they want. Problem solved.
_______________________
I couldn’t agree more. Drug Island. Spend the rest of your short lives being high as the flag on the 4th of July. Take all the money we spend on ‘rehab’ programs and buy them an island and all the drugs they want.
CC
If you look at the kind of sentences that were prevalent, say, in the 1890-1910 period, we have greatly increased punishments.
In 1900, a guy could beat up a cop, and get six months. Don’t try that today.
Moreover, when guys got out of jail, nobody thought much of it. They went back to their job at the factory and that was that.
There is a lot to be said for this. The key to crime reduction is not the length of the sentence, but the certainty of punishment. If you know you’re definitely going to jail, you’re far less likely to commit a crime. Our method is exactly the opposite. You have one chance in a hundred of serving 20 years, but you probably won’t be caught.
Back in those days a man could be legally hanged within weeks of murdering someone.
The Whipping Post was still in use some places for small crimes. Wife Beaters got to feel the whip!
Then the do-gooders came along, bawled and bellowed about “injustice” and got these vermin released on the public.
Bring back the noose and whipping post! Some people just need to feel rope burns before they expire and others a taste of the lash for minor crimes and misdemeanors.
I reject this premise. Criminals tend not to hold jobs or be responsible.
True, if you killed someone you were in big trouble.
But what modern people would find surprising is how much physical damage you could do short of murder, and get what we would consider today a very light sentence. The process was even faster than murder; you could be tried, convicted, and hauled off to the pokey within a few days of the crime.
The good old days!?
Too many?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.