Posted on 09/29/2016 7:07:15 PM PDT by pboyington
Many Fox News watchers lately seem to be mouthing the same thing; ‘What’s the deal with Megyn Kelly?’
Her show has materialized into the Trump People’s Court, with her as a newspeak Judge Wapner, passing death sentences on the nightly myriad of Trump news stories, spokespeople and pro-Donald pundits.
The show is sponsored by Megyn Kelly’s out of control ego, which if bottled, could power every village, town and city on the East Coast.
Under the pretense of appearing ‘fair and balanced,’ Ms. Kelly is anything but that. Every minute of her hour long show is devoted to one mission; destroying Donald Trump.
A perfect example is last night’s segment where Ms. Kelly interviewed former Miss Universe, Alicia Machado. Megyn Kelly was practically frothing at the mouth as Ms. Machado made every allegation in the world against Mr. Trump.
Ms. Kelly failed to mentions Ms. Machado’s possible involvement as a getaway driver in a 1997 murder and her alleged threats she made to a judge in Venezuela.
Every opportunity is spent bashing Trump. Ms. Kelly blames Trump for everything from the Manhattan traffic to current gas prices.
Every Trump sound bite is examined and verbally drawn and quartered by Ms. Kelly and her coterie of Democratic pundits and Never Trumpers.
Every Trump act is chopped and marinated and thrown into Megyn Kelly’s verbal Cuisinart to be ripped to shreds.
Every Trump triumph is gas lighted and somehow turned into a Trump failure.
Every Trump supporter and Trump campaign representative is grilled and interrogated as if they were prisoners of the Gestapo in a medieval dungeon.
I find it amusing that one of the most watched anti-Trump news shows runs every night on the nation’s only conservative network, Fox News.
Sandwiched between Bill O’Reilly who likes Trump, but treats him like a kid in Father O’Reilly’s sophomore Jesuit high school classroom and Sean Hannity, who hero worships Trump, it’s more than odd that Ms. Kelly’s show is a 60 minute anti-Trump advertisement every night.
One wonders what dirt Megyn Kelly has on the Fox News leadership that they allow her to run amok every night.
During the primaries, Megyn Kelly’s dislike for Trump was evident, but understandable, since they had both bickered during the first debate. Also, there were 16 other candidates out there in GOP Land.
But, now, during the general election, her open hatred of Trump is more than hard to take. Is she rooting for Hillary? If one wants to listen to a news anchor destroy Trump, why not turn on CNN or MSNBC.
Megyn Kelly no doubt has delusions of grandeur that are apparently higher than her throne on Fox News.
But, to many viewers, her attitude and her treatment of Mr. Trump are becoming unbearable.
Even worse than her careening off the cliff ego is the fact that Ms. Kelly might be harboring the biggest secret of all at Fox News; she may indeed be voting for Hillary Clinton.
How long will Megyn Kelly’s reign of terror on network news be allowed to continue? She’s turning off most Trump voters and her only possible viewers stem from the Never Trumpers and Democrats who enjoy watching the thin blond chick with the biker mullet attack the mega billionaire at 6 PM every night.
Megyn Kelly hates Trump because Trump is the kind of Type A personality, macho, self-made man who sees right through her veneer of feminist bravado and views her for what she really is, a legend in her own mind.
You have missed the point from the start. You cannot
prove Megyn Kelly is voting for Hillary Clinton just
on the basis of what she says about Donald Trump. That
is a fact and exactly why the thread article is bogus.
A person could absolutely hate Kelly and still understand
that truth if they don’t allow their hatred to blind them.
I know that Kelly pretty consistently bags on liberals
including the Clintons and that contributes to the
reason Kelly has not been able to have her interview
with Hillary. Life just doesn’t operate like some of
our hardcore black or white only FReeper friends think
it does. As I have previously stated it is possible
Kelly will be voting for Clinton but you can’t prove
it via the article in question. Is that so hard to
grasp?
Kelly has jumped on every leftist-liberal/Hillary smear on Trump they’ve come up with. I gave you two examples, and if I had the time and inclination I could give you many more. (Or if you were inquiring into the issues with honesty and integrity, you could find them for yourself.) These are not the actions of a person with any intention of voting for Trump. Sorry you can’t grasp that.
No sane person could have watched either of Kelly’s shameful, disgraceful debate-moderator performances—much less both—and imagine she could be a closet Trump supporter. And I mean that literally.
You still miss my point about the article.
Or, are you avoiding it?
Kelly told you herself what she’s focused on: gender and the first woman POTUS. Do the math.
And, if you were inquiring into issues with honesty
and integrity you could find many examples of Kelly
going after Hillary. Instead you come up with a bullshit
story about reading two sources about what Kelly has
to say.
By now you should realize that there is not one thing
you can nail me with that I cannot pound back with
something equal to or greater than your drivel.
Keep it coming. I will be working here and there
away from home but I can keep it going for weeks.
Yah, keep it coming. I will catch up to your posts
sometimes sooner, sometimes later.
You keep stating that and I keep telling you she is
doing a lube job on Hillary. Move on to your next
effort. Freshen up.
‘And, if you were inquiring into issues with honesty
and integrity you could find many examples of Kelly
going after Hillary.’
The Kelly of your imagination and the real world Kelly bear no resemblance to each other.
Your imagination working overtime agsin. At the time, Hillary was a miserably failed candidate and an even bigger failure of an ex-SoS. There was no objective reason for Kelly to kiss up to the LOSER. Kelly just loves gender and the concept of a woman POTUS.
If you were honest enough and well informed enough to give an intelligent answer to the following questions, this discussion would be over:
Why is Kelly featured in a Hillary campaign ad attacking Trump? Why does this fact upset Gender-Kelly so much?
#128 When was the Megyn - Hillary interview?
#129 When was the Megyn - Hillary interview?
#130 When was the Megyn - Hillary interview?
“Why is Kelly featured in a Hillary campaign ad
attacking Trump?”
Stunningly juvenile.
Here’s your problem, Sivad, in a nutshell and free of charge.
You’re the only one on this thread who believes as you do. All the rest agree with me.
So one of two things is the case. Either every single other conservative posting on this thread is too stupid to figure it out, and you’re the ONLY smart person.
Or you’re wrong.
The answer which stumped you, btw, is that Kelly is the best attack dog Hillary has. That’s why Hillary features Kelly in an ad attacking Trump.
When was the Megyn Kelly - Hillary Clinton interview?
Every other conservative on this substantial thread hears Kelly attacking Trump. You’re the only one who hears her attacking Hillary.
Psychologists have a word for that.
Psychosis.
I doesn’t matter who she is voting for. She’s just a hot mess, that’s all.
My pheasant hunting and salmon fishing buddy is a
retired school psychologist. He says you should
post when the Kelly - Hillary interview took place.
He also says he thinks Hillary is afraid of some tough
questions Kelly may ask.
As to other posters on this thread I would say that
perhaps some of them took the time to analyse the
article and figured out as I did that it was is faulty.
Hey, I’ve got a question. Just when did the fawning
Megyn Kelly interview with Hillary Clinton take place?
Mindless repetition is another sign of mental imbalance.
Avoidance of a simple but key question is a sign that
you have lost.
Why must you lie?
I answered your question. It was an excellent answer. You clearly didn’t understand it. That’s not my problem.
Asking a previously answered question over and over and over is trollish at best and mentally defective at worst.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.