I guess you missed the thousands of successful suits against companies/products that have very clear disclaimers: courts rule as they wish, especially if it is toward “democracy” or “social justice”.
The public nature of this would be unrelenting. No, I don’t care what the “law” says, this would be a “reverse Roberts” especially in a Republican state.
Have it your way. I’m just saying that the ballots in this state are clear that the voter in a Presidential election is casting a vote for electors, not for the candidate. How the courts might rule is quite another matter, true, but irrelevant to my post.
Personally, I don’t think that a case could be won where the basis is so easily proven false, simply by reading the ballot, and any such ruling would be overturned at once. Still, my tinfoil hat was severely damaged in a recent hailstorm, and I haven’t fashioned another yet.