What is YOUR problem? I keep referring-—since you apparently are too dense to do the research-—to the Palm Beach ballot of 2000, which was just as clearly written as the AZ election laws (I am here in AZ, by the way).
The Palm Beach ballot’s LANGUAGE was ignored by the courts to go with the “will of the public” and the “spirit of the law.” Not once, but several times, both courts and election boards.
What I’m telling you and what you are apparently too dense to get is that the language of the law as YOU read it doesn’t count. It’s only what a court says, and courts are heavily influenced by public opinion. So, for the umpteenth time, regardless of what the LANGUAGE of the Arizona law says, the court can and based on historical precedence WILL interpret that to say what the court wants it to say. And in a Republican state, I seriously doubt that they would uphold the precise language of the law and would instead go with Bush v. Gore that says that you cannot have multiple elections, multiple vote counts. It’s either who is on the ballot (not the “electors”, but the person named) or it isn’t a valid election. But you can have it your way and see what the courts rule.
I don’t give a pinch of shit what you have to say about the courts. You keep blathering about Palm Beach and all sorts of other crap, and I just don’t care what you have to say about that. Don’t tell me I’m too dense to do research, or what I’m too dense to get, you miserable asshole.