Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: FamiliarFace

Two related points really stick out **

1. Julian Assange was pretty upset over the death of this high level DNC staffer (likely informant), who had been strategically involved in the organizing the DNC election process.

2. The official report stated Seth had been shot TWICE in the back. However, it also reported or suggested he had been beaten as well, as “bruises” covered his body.

The above reporting does indicate “shots” (plural) were fired. As I recall, according to the police report Seth Rich was shot twice in the back. These stories give.

However, the same report also stated there were no witnesses.

If there was a fight where Seth Rich was beaten but mot robbed, the robbery narrative almost has to be false. And, even though early in the morning, how were there no witnesses, especially after at least two gun shots?

I guess there could have been a suppressor used, but it was almost assuredly not a robbery. This seems to be an intentional false narrative.

Hmmmmm.....

The police report itself does not seem right.

And they seemed to chalk it up to a robbery gone bad!

There is almost no way there is not more to Seth Rich’s execution!

If he was shot twice in the back, this was a hit.

The questions must then come back to who was behind it, and why (motive).

The answer going to motive may well be in front of us. Connecting the dots is the problem. Especially if it involves high level authorities and cover up.


27 posted on 08/15/2016 4:23:55 AM PDT by patriotfury (May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: patriotfury

All excellent points.

Another point is the killers did not take his phone. That means police have it. Lots of info on it, no doubt.


29 posted on 08/15/2016 6:47:04 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: patriotfury

They didn’t take his phone and they didn’t take his wallet, nor any cash that was in it. This would rule out a robbery gone awry pretty quickly. If robbery was the motive, even if they shot and killed him, they would have taken his valuables.

No, this was a hit.


30 posted on 08/15/2016 7:04:01 AM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: patriotfury

“but it was almost assuredly not a robbery.”

I think it was the Seth Rich story (although I may have it confused with another Clinton murder), but IIRC, he had a lot on him that thieves would take, but didn’t. Nothing was missing.


35 posted on 08/15/2016 5:46:36 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: patriotfury

placemark


36 posted on 08/15/2016 6:17:45 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson