Skip to comments.
Just In: Wikileaks Issues A Formal Statement On Murder Of DNC Staffer Seth Rich
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/763565863861616640 ^
| 8/10/2016
Posted on 08/10/2016 7:53:24 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
To: Crimson Elephant
Why would Assange mention Rich at all and why would WL
offer a $20,000 reward for help in solving his murder?
Must be SOME reason for that.
61
posted on
08/10/2016 9:48:08 PM PDT
by
Rockpile
(GOP legislators-----caviar eating surrender monkeys.)
To: Rusty0604
In general I don’t, but if it is someone who got murdered don’t you think people should know an assassination when it happens?
62
posted on
08/10/2016 10:06:00 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Larry Lucido
OP posts an extraordinary number of one-sentence excerpts from RetardState and other useless blogs. OP is more interested in hits than informing. I suspect OP gets a kick-back. Probably a dollar a day or more.Yep, also notice how the OP almost never comments on its threads?
63
posted on
08/11/2016 2:53:39 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
To: Fungi
Yep, he wimped out.NWO enemy number 1 is no wimp.
64
posted on
08/11/2016 4:09:54 AM PDT
by
Stentor
To: Talisker
No, he DIDN'T punk out - he assured his sources they will not be exposed.He assured his sources that if they are murdered, Wikileaks does NOT have their backs. Wikileaks will write them off as collateral damage and move on.
65
posted on
08/11/2016 4:19:34 AM PDT
by
sphinx
To: sphinx
... and what, exactly, do you think wikileaks should do if a source is murdered?
... and what makes you think Seth rich was a source?
66
posted on
08/11/2016 4:38:33 AM PDT
by
bankwalker
(Does a fish know that it's wet?)
To: bankwalker
I have no opinion on that, one way or the other. But I do think that Wikileaks should made a definitive statement. There are seven billion people in the world. Saying that Seth Rich was not a souce would not blow the cover of X. Confirming that he WAS a source, however, would be an important public service.
67
posted on
08/11/2016 5:16:24 AM PDT
by
sphinx
To: TigersEye
So true. Families can be serious affected or even die if Hillary thinks they know too much!
68
posted on
08/11/2016 5:37:11 AM PDT
by
nclaurel
To: sphinx
But I do think that Wikileaks should made a definitive statement. you are free to start your own version of wikileaks if you think you can do it better.
69
posted on
08/11/2016 7:12:34 AM PDT
by
bankwalker
(Does a fish know that it's wet?)
To: sphinx
He assured his sources that if they are murdered, Wikileaks does NOT have their backs. Wikileaks will write them off as collateral damage and move on. Most people don't live in a void. If a murdered person is confirmed as a wiki leaker, that endangers their friends, family and associates.
70
posted on
08/11/2016 10:17:55 AM PDT
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson