I am glad he posted it. The interview is very interesting depsite being on the stupid Christian Times site.
And are you hall monitor? And do you think your font was big enough?
You are pretty much a black and white person aren’t you. No grey zones in your posts. Lol.
| I watched the video multiple times. No other conclusion can be drawn from that interview other than that Assange has admitted that Seth was his (partial if not primary) source. Assange clearly nods "yes" to all the pertinent questions from the reporter. In Assange interviews, he often gestures yes and no with his face and hands. It is clearly a physical expression, and it is the most physically and visually obvious I have ever seen. And it leaves nothing in the way of plausible deniability. Seth was clearly assasinated. But, it seems from the interview that he may not have been the only source for the data. Perhaps he was one of several individual for exposing that data. It also seems clear that he has been used as an "example" for any other would be leak-makers. It seems clear to all, who are not ostriches or clinton trolls, that this is a clear warning to any other potential leakers that they are next... if they don't lock it down. It is likely that access to the server was compromised to professional hackers via his compliance or negligence. The DB troves of email have most likely been downloaded in their entirety. The server was virtually unsecured to begin with (the admin must have been sleeping at the bench) and now all that former data has been mirrored at alternate secured locations for bu... and future deployment. I think it will ALL come out. It was known from the day the report came out about Seths untimely demise... that this could be another ARKANCIDE of the highest order. Comey is breathing a sigh of relief... for now. (apparently he chose wisely) |