Michigan Governor Vetoes Bill Limiting Consumer Auto Parts Choices

Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 6/28/2016 | Jarrett Skorup

[MichCapCon]

When the Michigan Legislature passes a bill by wide margins, it is usually signed into law, regardless of how good the actual policy is. But a bill that would have discriminated against certain auto parts and added red tape for consumers and businesses was recently vetoed by Gov. Snyder.

As we previously wrote:

Right now, if a Michigan citizen goes to get a car repaired, it is fairly simple for the owner of the vehicle and a mechanic to decide what kind of parts to use to provide the fix. Unless a bill that has passed the Michigan Legislature is vetoed by Gov. Snyder, that process is about to get a lot more complicated.

There are two main types of auto parts: Those made by original equipment manufacturers (OEM) or those made by other companies (aftermarket). By and large, insurance companies, crash tests and research findings do not find a safety difference between the two — but OEM parts are usually significantly more expensive.

Gov. Snyder took heed, vetoing House Bill 4344 with good reason. As Mlive noted:

Groups including the free market think tank The Mackinac Center had been critical of the bill's limitation on aftermarket parts. Jarrett Skorup, policy analyst with the Mackinac Center, said many studies have shown aftermarket parts to be just as safe and often less expensive. "Consumers should have that choice in deciding which auto parts they want to use," Skorup said.

The governor noted in his veto letter that while the bill had some good components, the law would have limited aftermarket parts that have no effect on consumer health and safety. He wrote, “Michigan's aftermarket auto parts industry is strong because of its competition with OEMs. Indeed, by ensuring robust and open competition between OEM parts and aftermarket parts, consumers see the benefits of safety improvements stemming from that competition. Enacting a law to prohibit mechanics from providing high quality and safe alternatives for customers is an inappropriate impediment on the competition that has resulted in both high quality OEM and aftermarket parts for Michigan drivers to enjoy.”

[Zathras]

I just spent 10k on my car, much of which was fixing flaws in the OEM parts and replacing them with much better components.
The parts failed because of Gov mandates for low octane and high MPG.

The pistons were hammered by detonation.

[KarlInOhio]

Another article had this explanation of the bill:

For the first five years of a car’s warranty, should the bill become law, mechanics could not use aftermarket parts on many components unless directed by the owner of the vehicle in writing. Parts manufacturers say this will harm and perhaps even cripple their industry and are urging a veto.

If it is under warranty and the car company is paying for it, I want OEM parts. If I am paying for it, I want both options given and I'll decide if it is worth the price.