Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

1) Doesn’t do anything about existing obligations. It will take a long time to help.
2)It would be nice (but I don’t see it happening).
3) I think the courts would rule this unconstitutional. I believe they have in Illinois
4) This is basically the same as 2)
5) Could actually help. You sell the property and then local governments would collect property taxes.
6) Better to sell. Giving the government is sealing off more and more property in the west it would require a change in direction


16 posted on 06/28/2016 2:02:48 PM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: alternatives?

You completely evaded the questions. Most inquisitive.

I’ve heard your rebuttal a hundred times by assorted insider frauds and those on the payroll.

“It won’t do anything, It’s too hard, too difficult, it won’t do any good, it would be nice but it’s not going to happen, it won’t completely solve these country killing issues which are all sponsored by those in government”.

No sale.


19 posted on 06/28/2016 2:13:10 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deciet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson