Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AG Lynch: Obama's Endorsement Not Conflict Of Interest With FBI Investigation
Newsninja2012 ^ | 6-19-16 | Wayne Dupree

Posted on 06/19/2016 7:02:15 AM PDT by WayneDupreeShow

Let me start off by saying any news anchor that thinks they will get a straight and truthful answer from anyone in the Obama administration has to be as dumb as the day is long.

Why even attempt to ask anyone one in government a question like this when they've been lying to the American people for years. Is ridiculous how we who use common sense can peep out when the mainstream media is pushing their agenda once again.

No this is not a conflict of interest for me, for the department or for anyone. We will continue to do all of our work the same way in which we've always have, with the interest of the American people.
How many of you believe this statement from Atty. Gen. Loretta Lynch? She knows that she talked to Barack Obama about the case that involves Hillary Clinton, but she's not going to go on the main television Sunday Talk Shows and tell Chris Wallace of FOXNews or anyone else that's what the conversation was about.

Screen Shot 2016-06-19 at 9.42.01 AM

I'm not stupid, and I'm not dumb. They talked about Hillary and a whole lot more stuff. Also, when you watch the video below, listen to how Lynch categorized the investigation "the emails." Just so that you know, this is about way more than emails.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsninja2012.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: barackobama; blogpimp; fbi; hillaryclinton; isis; kenyanbornmuzzie; lorettalynch; underthebuswithyou
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: shelterguy

From “screwed” to “truly screwed?” Screwed is screwed, no matter what adjective is used.


21 posted on 06/19/2016 8:35:33 AM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WayneDupreeShow

She’s as rehearsed and polished in those answers as she was when she sat to be confirmed as AG. Lies like a rug without a qualm!

“Yes, I was at the WH talking to the president and we never discussed the tornado that just tore through DC. I would never discuss something like that with him.”


22 posted on 06/19/2016 8:48:07 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu
I'm less concerned about non-password protected secret or above e-mail and MUCH more concerned by the intentional act of hiding government documents on a private machine because she wanted to avoid accountability to the people.

Your position on Hillary possible reason (wanting to 'avoid accountability to the people') is charitable to say the least... Knowing the Clinton perchance for selling influence and anything else not nailed down - I would assume worse. "Oh thanks for your $500,000 (for a 42 minute speech) and here's my private email address so we can keep in touch" - swap yoga positions etc...

Still as you say, it's a crime - but as stated on that's not quite that easy to understand for the average citizen. And that IS the goal of liberal elites.

23 posted on 06/19/2016 8:55:22 AM PDT by GOPJ (When a Muslim terrorist shoots up a gay bar, itÂ’s not gun violence.ItÂ’s Islamic terrorism.Greenfie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kingu
I'm less concerned about non-password protected secret or above e-mail and MUCH more concerned by the intentional act of hiding government documents on a private machine because she wanted to avoid accountability to the people.

Your position on Hillary's possible reason (wanting to 'avoid accountability to the people') is charitable to say the least... Knowing the Clinton perchance for selling influence and anything else not nailed down - I would assume worse. "Oh thanks for your $500,000 (for a 42 minute speech) and here's my private email address so we can keep in touch" - swap yoga positions etc...

Still as you say, it's a crime - but as stated on that's not quite that easy to understand for the average citizen. And that IS the goal of liberal elites.

24 posted on 06/19/2016 8:56:07 AM PDT by GOPJ (When a Muslim terrorist shoots up a gay bar, itÂ’s not gun violence.ItÂ’s Islamic terrorism.Greenfie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WayneDupreeShow

If a liberal activist says that it’s so, it must be true.


25 posted on 06/19/2016 9:09:39 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (When was the last time you heard a celebrity say, If Trump wins, I'm moving to MEXICO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneDupreeShow

Seems like the very definition of “appearance of conflict of interest”. Just like the SoS taking $10s of millions personally from countries and individuals the state department is dealing with.

When the state dept approved the arms sales or if the DoJ ends up not indicting then citizens can understandably think there is corruption. And that’s very damaging to the country even if the right decision was/is made and why government officials are supposed to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest.


26 posted on 06/19/2016 9:10:55 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneDupreeShow

Why did you excerpt your own material rather than posting the whole thing?

Is your actual goal to redirect FR’s traffic to your blog for fun and profit?


27 posted on 06/19/2016 9:16:51 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

I don’t know; I’ve posted what she’s done, outraged, but neglected to name the former cabinet secretary (or even which administration) and had liberals come swarming to demand their head, and fume more when they find out it is Clinton (and wave Bernie flags.)

It is pretty easy to understand: No one believes a politician who hides something from the public is up to any good.


28 posted on 06/19/2016 10:15:50 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WayneDupreeShow

What she’s trying to say is, where there’s no investigation, there’s no conflict of interest. This sounds like Lynch sucking up to be the next flunky on SCOTUS.


29 posted on 06/19/2016 10:15:55 AM PDT by DPMD (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Good point.


30 posted on 06/20/2016 7:47:05 AM PDT by GOPJ (When a Muslim terrorist shoots up a gay bar, itÂ’s not gun violence.ItÂ’s Islamic terrorism.Greenfie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson