Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity
Fact of the matter is that genuine white supremacists, the KKK or its fellow travelers, number between 2500 and 5000 with 3500 being the most credible estimate. They are social pariahs and live in isolated places like the Tennessee hills or Idaho panhandle. They hold zero significant positions of public authority.

Various other religious and racial supremacist groups number in the millions, including La Raza. They are nearly everywhere and hold numerous significant positions of public authority, like this judge. They are not social pariahs, but news media darlings.

11 posted on 06/07/2016 7:07:24 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman
Fact of the matter is that genuine white supremacists, the KKK or its fellow travelers, number between 2500 and 5000 with 3500 being the most credible estimate. They are social pariahs and live in isolated places like the Tennessee hills or Idaho panhandle. They hold zero significant positions of public authority. Various other religious and racial supremacist groups number in the millions, including La Raza. They are nearly everywhere and hold numerous significant positions of public authority, like this judge. They are not social pariahs, but news media darlings.

:::::::::: Response to Vigilanteman Follows ::::::::::

Actually, there are more KKK members in the midwest than the South. The KKK is virtually non-existent down here. Not sure from where your "credible" "Tennessee/Idaho" assumption originated ... but there are very few "isolated" areas remaining in the foothills of Tennessee. You've obviously never been to the TriCities area or the stretch from there to Knoxville.

Anyways, yes, Trump is correct and he has every right to make a public issue out of it - he's only using the same tactics the left has used for decades - and he's probably correct that the judge is handling this case unfairly and in a biased, partisan fashion based upon the short history of his rulings in this case thus far. I do believe, however, that you are confusing the two "La Razas." This judge, as biased as he appears to be, is not a member of the radical La Raza group. Now, if I am not mistaken, I seem to remember that Sotemeyer is, or was, at some point in her history.

Trump's instincts appears to be pretty good IMHO. He just has an extremely difficult time conveying his thoughts in a politically pleasing way at times.
20 posted on 06/07/2016 7:28:22 AM PDT by JRPerry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson