Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim 0216
It's actually 6000 years old.

So.. relatively new then?

2 posted on 06/04/2016 11:46:31 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: humblegunner

Relative, I guess so. But 6000 years of the same thing isn’t what you’d call a “new” idea.


3 posted on 06/04/2016 11:53:19 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner

There are arguments about whether 6000 is literal or symbolic. 6000 is a Jewish tradition, and Judaism was the cradle of Christianity. Actually the count in Jewish tradition is not yet quite 6000 — 6000 is the point at which the world is supposed to end. It was deduced by numerical mysticism from the presence of six “aleph” characters in the first verse of Genesis in the original Hebrew — aleph also being a term that means thousand.

I go pretty much whole hog old-earth creationist here. The Einsteinian theory of relativity will yield the scientific rationale for any time dilatation that is needed. Translated: what it looked like in God’s time frame depends on how fast God moved, and approaching or exceeding warp speed is no problem for an omnipotent Deity.


11 posted on 06/04/2016 12:07:41 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner

I’d like to know what the Indians were thinking 13,000 years ago.


12 posted on 06/04/2016 12:08:48 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson