Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal court to Obama: You can’t spend money on ObamaCare if Congress didn’t allocate
Canada Free Press ^ | 05/13/16 | Dan Calabrese

Posted on 05/13/2016 9:01:42 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

Federal court to Obama: Sorry, champ, you can't spend money on ObamaCare if Congress didn't allocate it

It seemed an astoundly obvious case. The power of the purse belongs to Congress, and the executive branch can’t just spend money if Congress never passed a bill allocating the money. But ths is the presidency of Barack Obama, where things like the Constitution and balances of power are mere puzzles to be solved by a power-crazed executive. Remember, this is the guy who regularly declares, “If Congress won’t act, I will!”

No, champ. If Congress won’t act, you can’t. That’s how the system is supposed to work. But Obama was determined to spend federal money reimbursing health insurers for their ObamaCare losses. As with so many other things ObamaCare, if the White House has to respect the discretion of Congress, the whole damn thing falls to pieces. So Congress or no Congress, law or no law, they have to spend the money. To do otherwise would to see their golden goose slain.


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Politics
KEYWORDS: congress; federalcourt; obama; obamacare

1 posted on 05/13/2016 9:01:42 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
 
 
No problem - Paul Ryan and the RINO brigade to the rescue.
 
 

2 posted on 05/13/2016 9:03:33 AM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lapsus calami

took the words out of my mouth


3 posted on 05/13/2016 9:06:32 AM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Except the judge stayed her own ruling. For the non-legal aware, ‘stay’ means block the ruling.

That means Obama can go right ahead and spend the money however they want. Congress has to appeal the stay which could take another year or so.

So this is a nothing burger.

The ruling essentially says “you can’t do that! But I’m not stopping you!”


4 posted on 05/13/2016 9:24:42 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Even the courts do Kabuki theater now. What a pathetic joke this government has become.


5 posted on 05/13/2016 9:28:02 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Obama to court: “Kiss off... I’ll do whatever I want”.


6 posted on 05/13/2016 9:33:38 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Exactly. It is meaningless as usual when it comes anyone stopping unconstitutional executive actions.


7 posted on 05/13/2016 9:45:19 AM PDT by rod1 (CTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Nixon got slapped down for not spending money Congress allocated.

Obama spends money Congress didn’t allocate.


8 posted on 05/13/2016 9:49:36 AM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Not to worry. Congresscritters will roll over and pucker up for the Big O.


9 posted on 05/13/2016 10:55:59 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Can’t do it. Unconstitutional, to paraphrase the decision.

Obama: Watch me.


10 posted on 05/13/2016 11:13:37 PM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I’m not saying this ruling is wrong - I just don’t know enough about how congress works to understand it.

The cost sharing reduction part was already in the plan voted on in the middle of the night on a weekend behind closed doors. so it is part of Obamacare just like the subsidies for premiums are.

why would congress have to vote to fund these every year? And if they do, shouldn’t the subsidies for premiums be treated the same way?


11 posted on 05/14/2016 7:18:20 AM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson