1) We have evidence that she was a US Citizen
2) We know that the residency laws of Canada required 5 years of residence prior to being accepted as a Canadian citizen
3) No evidence has been supplied that she became a Canadian Citizen.
4) No evidence has been supplied that she ever renounced her US citizenship as required by USC Title 8 section 1481.
The logical fallicy that you are engaging is called “tu quoque”. YOU made the statement that she was a Canadian citizen so it is up to YOU to support your claim.
1) We have evidence that she was a US Citizen
"Was". They left for Canada, started a business and made family there. That sounds "Canadian" enough to me.
She and toddler Felito emigrated to the US only when/because husband bailed on the family and left them in Canada.
2) We know that the residency laws of Canada required 5 years of residence prior to being accepted as a Canadian citizen.
Okay, so show me that info. I won't believe you until you show it to me. For all I know, you're making that up.
3) No evidence has been supplied that she became a Canadian Citizen.
She moved away and made a family with her foreign husband in Canada. Common Sense raises questions with your "no evidence" claim.
You're not Ted Cruz, are you, so you can't prove it one way or another.
The paperwork exists. Let's see it.
4) No evidence has been supplied that she ever renounced her US citizenship as required by USC Title 8 section 1481.
She left and started a business and made a family with her foreign husband in Canada. Common Sense raises questions with your "no evidence" claim.
Again...you're not Ted Cruz, are you, so you can't prove it one way or another.
The paperwork exists. Let's see it.
You are saying "Trust" but then you forget the "but verify" part.
I say, "ef that and the Trojan horse it rode in on."
I haven't gotten to "trust", yet.
How about we start with "verify", instead?
Proof. Got any?
The paperwork exists. Let's see it.