I will assume that your sequence of events is accurate.
How does that in any way change the point that I was making, that when a political apparatus takes control rather than the people, bad things happen?
I will assume that your sequence of events is accurate.
How does that in any way change the point that I was making, that when a political apparatus takes control rather than the people, bad things happen?
<><><><><><
I believe that if you are going to make historical arguments, your facts (which are easily verifiable) should be beyond reproach.
Yours were not. And when part of one’s argument is less than accurate, it calls the conclusions into question.
/ history nerd mode