Fields has a very bad background. Here’s a summary and yes, it’s verifiable:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3415573/posts?page=95#95
Her mother is also from Central America, is pro-illegal amnesty and a Hillary supporter. So it is known from where she hails.
Put it all together and the picture is of a fraud trying to create trouble.
The reason it is newsworthy is because a Clinton supporting prosecutor stepped forward to take advantage and allowed charges to be filed. These charges will be dismissed but it points to yet one more example of how the left operates. It is harassment, pure and simple.
Don’t misunderstand me. I think we feel exactly the same way about this.
I just didn’t agree with the method of cutting it off on the very first post is all. I wanted to learn something more. Heck, you can probably watch any network news or read a paper (I don’t do either) and the information they give you is not only untrustworthy, but deliberately so. And it is monotonously presented in a fairly uniform manner amongst those medias.
I get my jumping off point for news on FR.
That, and the opportunity for raw opinion and commentary by people who aren’t paid wear a suit or dress, put on makeup, and read a script. That’s why I come here. I want info on the arms trade, I go to hear what Freepers like Jeff Head and sukhoi-30mki have to say. If I am curious about Energy issues, I will go to threads where thackney may be found. And so on.
I don’t always agree with them, but I appreciate that they have something to say and may shed light on an issue I might possibly never consider.
I came into that discussion about bruises with very little information, and was hoping to learn more.