Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: suthener
Another fact; the Supreme Court ruled that severe restrictions on “sawed off” shotguns were constitutional because they weren’t militia weapons.

I sure am glad to hear that!


20 posted on 03/25/2016 11:35:45 AM PDT by archy (Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, and eat you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: archy

I never said it was a correct decision, but it is true. Look up United States v. Miller. Here’s one of the goverments arguments in support of the law (National Firearms Act of 1934):

3.The Second Amendment protects only the ownership of military-type weapons appropriate for use in an organized militia.

Now they argue you shouldn’t own an AR 15 because it is desgned to be used in the militia!


21 posted on 03/25/2016 12:46:18 PM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson