My understanding is that Loretta Lynch is no Eric Holder.
Eric Holder was a radical first, who took part in the violent occupation of buildings while a student in Columbia University.
Lynch is less ideological, more of an ambitious climber, who leverages her Democrat Party connections to advance. She spent a lot of time as a prosecutor. Although the Party could call on her to handle cases they wanted prosecuted, she was relatively professional in handling other cases. She had a pretty positive reputation among FBI Agents who had worked in her district, when she went to her confirmation hearings.
She is much less likely to stick her neck out with a brazen abuse of office than Holder would be.
In other words, Hillary has done more damage to the National Security than Julius and Ethyl did by transmitting the secrets of the A-bomb to the Russians. David Greenglass, Ethyl's brother, worked at Los Alamos and smuggled out the secret designs. The Rosenbergs reduced everything to microdot and gave them to their Soviet spy master. Russia was able to detonate its first nuclear device using compromised Manhattan Project data, four years (1949) after the A-bombs were dropped on Japan to end WW2. The Rosenbergs were tried for treason, found guilty, and executed in the Sing Sing electric chair (1953).