Posted on 02/17/2016 4:42:51 PM PST by Helicondelta
Diana Orrock, the Nevada state committeewoman for the Republican National Committee, is among the latest high-profile figures insisting that GOP presidential candidate (and Texas Senator) Ted Cruz is ineligible for the presidency because he is not a "natural-born citizen".
Orrock didn't stop there, however. She also argues that Florida Senator Marco Rubio should be disqualified from running because he was born to immigrant parents, despite the fact that he was born in Miami, Florida.
She tweeted on Tuesday the link to the right-wing website "News with Views", featuring an article that discusses the Constitutional grounds that would allegedly disqualify the two Senators from running for president:
The article's author, Devvy Kidd, wrote in part:
Donald Trump can take the high road on this by stating there are two candidates who are not constitutionally eligible to be on the ballot, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz.
Kidd went on suggest the language Trump should use when calling out the two Hispanic candidates::
My actions would be the same if the candidates were John Kasich or Dr. Ben Carson. I am running to take an oath to preserve and protect the U.S. Constitution and that's what I'm doing.
It's a most unfortunate situation for both candidates and their supporters but surely they (Ted Cruz being a lawyer and former Solicitor General for the State of Texas) should have known they do not meet constitutional eligibility.
(Excerpt) Read more at ijreview.com ...
She’s kinda hot, in a heavily made-up, `just chewed my way out of the restraints and climbed out of bed’ way.
She should tell Trump to drop out since he’s a NBI (Natural Born Idiot).
I am with you. Read it 2x. What’s the catch?
We decided we didn’t want to be subjects anymore about 1776.
One is NATURALLY a US citizen when one can be no other.
Born here of citizen parents
Natural born citizen
Stupidly ridiculous
That’s your own definition you made up. It’s not in the Constitution. If the framers didn’t want natural-born to mean what it did in Britain, they would’ve used different words.
It was commonly understood until recently.
It has been purposely obfuscated to undermine the Constitution and the protection that requirement renders.
Isn’t Barack Hussein Obama proof enough of the wisdom?
He already doesn’t.
Wish the GOPe would be this vociferous against Obama.
If you believe that opposition to a flip flopping Manhattenite pretend-Conservative, makes you a
Now: In an interview with Bloomberg Politics in January, Trump said, "I'm pro-life and I have been pro-life." He said he believed there should be exceptions in cases of rape, incest or the life of the mother.
Now: At the 2015 NRA-ILA Leadership Forum, Trump said if he became president, "the 2nd Amendment will be totally protected." He told the Web site Ammoland he does "not support expanding background checks" and said current background checks "don't work."
Now:Â On NBC on Wednesday, he called Clinton "the worst secretary of state in the history of our nation" and said she would be "a terrible president."
Now:Â Has been a registered Republican since 2009.
There are also some flips which haven't necessarily been from left to right.
Now:Â On Fox News's "On The Record" this week, he called Bush "pathetic" for his support of Common Core, said his immigration views were "baby stuff."
I think the RNC should drop out of the race and let the people decide.
Wonder if she peeped anything about Obama back when...............
She’s a Trump supporter and she’s running for assemblywoman in the 9th district.
“The Nevada GOP action to remove marriage and life from their platform is a disgrace,” wrote McLarty. “The move does nothing to unify the Republican Party. Republicans will continue to lose elections if we canât even stand for protecting the most vulnerable lives among us; or for keeping sacred five thousand plus years of natural human sexuality. Both are direct attacks on God and the family.”
Orrock responds that the inclusion of divisive social issues has no place in the GOP platform.
What did she say about zer0?
IRREFUTABLE AUTHORITY HAS SPOKEN
(Oct. 18, 2009) The Post & Email has in several articles mentioned that the Supreme Court of the United States has given the definition of what a ‘natural born citizen’ is. Since being a natural born citizen is an objective qualification and requirement of office for the U.S. President (and VP), it is important for all U.S. Citizens to understand what this term means.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/
speaking of NBC, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3398474/posts
Sounds like a Trump parrot. Does she use “great” and “win” in her stump speeches?
It’s odd that she would get her information from Devvy Kidd, a columnist. You would think she could find a credible source before she starting running her mouth.
Wrong. In Britain before the Constitution was written, a natural-born subject included a child born to British parents outside of the countryâs territory.
___________________________________________
Guess that eliminates Cruz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.