Symposium: Why United States v. Texas is the most important case the Court will decide this year
Ping to Article and # 3 , # 5 .
It was hoped that the SCOTUS review on this matter would have been put off until next year to distance the issue from the politics around it.
I’m afraid that certain justices (Kennedy) are themselves afraid, angry and seeking revenge on conservatives. Any lawyer or jurist would have to wonder how it is that SCOTUS even hears this case when the underlying case has not even been heard on its merits.
Injunctions only serve to put things on hold while a case is heard, In this instance SCOTUS is asked to overturn the injunction but in doing so the merits of the underlying case would become moot as the deleterious outcome is allowed to manifest itself regardless of the case.
In other words, by even hearing the injunction case SCOTUS is saying they are going to pull a plug on a sinking boat while the boat’s occupants discuss who or what caused the leak and how such leaks might be prevented in the future. Meanwhile, the boat sinks as the plug is pulled.
Why would SCOTUS pull such a figurative plug? Politics. By leaving the plug in place, conservatives win. By pulling the plug, progressives win.
What’s at stake? The outcome of the 2016 general election.
Many millions, at least five and probably more than ten, of illegal aliens are without documentation that is registered with states and federal government. This is the basis for Obama’s Executive Amnesty. Once the injunction is set aside, the registrations which are now prepped and ready to go will be processed with lightning speed along with citizenship applications because the ACORN-type organizers have all ‘coached’ the illegals to declare they have been in the USA for more than 5 years, hence eligible for citizenship. With citizenship comes the right to vote.
The political parties have war rooms set up where every state, every county, every precinct is monitored and updated in an information system that reports real-time status. Software is used to highlight and pinpoint critical precincts, counties, and states that are needed to win. The Obama administration has already demonstrated their ability to mass transport refugees and other persons from place to place according to a plan. Same-day voter registration provides an opportunity to immediately enlarge a voter base in a critical zone with persons that are subject to mass movement. Could such a stunt be pulled off? All the related signs and events of the past point to a yes answer.
A banking leftwinger in Davos, Switzerland recently let it slip that it doesn’t matter who is nominated in the USA to be President because only Hillary is going to win. How does he ‘know’ that? We all know quite a lot about Soros don’t we? Do we think Soros is an isolated phenomenon?
Back to SCOTUS, it looks like they are gearing up to slam conservatives on this case because they always throw conservatives a bone before lowering the boom on them. For example, they just handed conservatives a victory on Obama’s EPA regs, so now the path is clear to bludgeon conservatives on Executive Amnesty. After all, they are impartial, aren’t they?
Thanks for your insight and thanks Elderberry for posting.
Although at the moment it doesn’t look as if “Hillary is going to win” we know they are capable of pulling stunts that will enable it.
LucyT ping to #3
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3395091/posts?page=3#3
Symposium: Why United States v. Texas is the most important case the Court will decide this year
Ping to Article and # 3 , # 5 .