Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’d agree, except that Trump’s Republican poll numbers were TERRIBLE before he announced and just when he announced...why weren’t his numbers ‘inflated’ then, everyone already knew who he was BEFORE he ran.

And then he mentioned the wall and they started going up, and up, and up...

So New Hampshire will be the REAL TEST. If Trump makes it to 35%, then his numbers CLEARLY are real. If 30-35, then maybe, if lower, then maybe some merit here.

Iowa didn’t mean jack, given how they vote versus how they poll. Until pollsters start including the ‘evangelical factor’ in polling, which basically means adjusting the candidate’s apparent level of support either up or down up to 5 points, depending on their ‘religious creds’, they will never get it right. Had they done this the past 3 rounds, they would have predicted the winner.


53 posted on 02/08/2016 3:57:08 AM PST by BobL (Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BobL

Iowa is a screwy system that makes voting harder and allows for funny business. The candidate that spends the most time and money organizing volunteers and dragging people to the polls wins. Cruz probably had a second home there for the past 2 years and Trump still came in a close second. Iowa is a joke, I wish all candidates would start ignoring it and lower it’s status.


60 posted on 02/08/2016 4:57:23 AM PST by bigtoona (Lose on amnesty, socialism cemented in place forever Trump is the only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson