I suppose you don’t remember him boasting he could shoot someone and not lose votes either? The pollsters, the media, and the pundits were telling us Trump would carry Iowa and in an actual vote tally, you’re not going to spin it with a “few percentage points” as you would with polling. I expected Trump to lose Iowa just as I expect him to lose in future primaries, because like a lot of people I welcomed his stance on illegal immigration through our southern border and his opposition to importing Muslims but I expect more from a candidate than a few choice sound bytes. After all, it wasn’t that long ago when Trump critcized Romney for being to harsh on illegals and he admitted his golf course exploys them. When you actually bother vetting Trump, what you find is someone that registered Democrat, contributed to Democrats like Schumer, praised Obama’s bailouts and stimulus “good job,” supports nationalizing healthcare, supported abortion, supported gun control, and that’s just the tip of it. As for your claim, please dispense with accusations of “Cruz tactics” because this manufactured scandal over Carson’s dead campaign are the same tactics used by the Left to distract and bring down their opponents. It amazes me that you will hang Ted Cruz with TPA alone knowing he voted against it and knowing he has specifically said he will oppose TPP.
I remember very well his remark about shooting someone. i considered it very funny as did a lot of people not overcome with searching for the dirt in a gnat’s eyebrows.
So you appreciate Trump bringing an overwhelming AntiAmerican subject front and center but consider it just a “sound bite in the long run.”
Well, you stick to your sound bites and your so called conservativeism. I’ll stick to supporting the one person who has both the brains and the skills to get the job done.
As far as “vetting” Trump is concerned, I’ve seen him in action close up for over a quarter century. I know how he thinks. That’s enough for me.
Go Trump!