Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lagmeister
You miss the point completely. Trump is well known and as such he is usually within the margin of error with Hillary. That is where you would expect a Republican to be at this time. The other candidates, especially Cruz, are not known so the poll simply reflects and anti Hillary vote.

If the other candidates' performance "simply reflects and [sic] anti Hillary vote," then wouldn't it be the case that Trump's performance also reflects whatever anti-Hillary sentiment exists in the electorate? So, Trump is losing to Hillary in the polls, notwithstanding the anti-Hillary vote?

95 posted on 02/01/2016 10:57:28 AM PST by dem bums
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: dem bums

No. Trump carries some negatives. The other candidates do not because they have not yet been identified. Stalin would get 45% of the vote in the democrat party, just to start. Let me put it this way: Once a candidate is actually labeled with conservative values then a person actually has a choice. You cannot place ‘blank sheet’ and ‘choice’ at the same time. The same applies to ‘second choice’ in the Republican poll. There really can’t be a second choice as long as your first choice is there. It is all talk show fodder until people actually have to make a choice between things that are actually known.


101 posted on 02/01/2016 11:04:06 AM PST by Lagmeister ( false prophets shall rise, and shall show signs and wonders Mark 13:22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson