Replies

Trump's editorial from 1/22/16 states that he opposes abortion except in the cases of rape and life of mother.

Pro-abortionists have used "life of the mother" to include ANY excuse to kill the unborn.

Headache - kill the baby.

Can't go dancing for a month - kill the baby.

Don't want stretch marks. - kill the baby.

A baby will create stress in my life - kill the baby.

A baby will make me poor - kill the baby.

Let me be clear: I am prolife.. I support that position with exceptions allowed for rape, incest or the life of the mother being at risk. I did not always hold this position, but I had a significant personal experience that brought the precious gift of life into perspective for me. 1/23/16 op-ed

As I explained, I am a Catholic prolifer and abide no exceptions, including contraception.

But given my stance, I still look for the most prolife position when the alternatives are not in total alignment with the absolute prolife position.

What you say has too often been true, but more in terms of the health of the mother.

But back to your original statement, that the three are equivalent in their positions, which is not true. Neither Clinton nor Bloomberg would make any statement other than: "A woman's right to choose abortion is fundamental and absolute."

Trump would not make such a statement.