Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Yosemitest

That was a naturalization act that was revoked. Right?


217 posted on 01/11/2016 7:44:09 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: PA-RIVER
Also Notice the signature blocks at the bottom of this:



1st United States Congress, 21-26 Senators and 59-65 Representatives



221 posted on 01/12/2016 2:37:17 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

To: PA-RIVER
-- hat was a naturalization act that was revoked. Right? --

Whatever it was, it is said to define NBC. If you were in the class of "children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States," you are NBC. If you are not in that class, you are not NBC. That's the way definitions usually work.

People who see the Act as a definition (and I would say that is the vast majority of them who confront this) reject the notion that this part of the act created a legal fiction, and was not a definition. But if it was a definition, it would have included at least some of the people born in the US (not Indians, some reference to state citizenship, and so on).

Seeing as how the 1790 Act doesn't define the citizenship of persons born in the US, I wonder where the people who cite 1790 Act as a definition go, to find the source of citizenship of persons born in the US, before the 14th amendment existed.

222 posted on 01/12/2016 2:50:55 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson