Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/11/2016 4:52:40 AM PST by Joachim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: Joachim

It would be a kick-in-the-ass if we got two front runners, Cruz and Mrs. Bill and both of them get disqualified after, say, Super Tuesday, one by being indicted and arrested, the other by the Court for not being a Natural Born.


2 posted on 01/11/2016 4:55:30 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

Great post!


3 posted on 01/11/2016 4:55:51 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

What do you farm, Farmer John?


4 posted on 01/11/2016 4:57:01 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

Wow, must’ve scored real well in logic class.


5 posted on 01/11/2016 4:58:25 AM PST by HonorInPa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

I hope you are prepared to be blasted by Cruz supporters.


7 posted on 01/11/2016 4:59:45 AM PST by PJBankard (It is better to be thought an idiot than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

Joachim or Mark Levin? Who should I trust?


8 posted on 01/11/2016 5:00:54 AM PST by demshateGod (Trump for press secretary! Cruz for president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim
Any citizen whose citizenship is derived from an act of Congress is thus a naturalized citizen, constitutionally speaking, and thus not "natural born."

Wait a second here. Since the Constitution never actually defines the term "natural born citizen," and thus is falls to Congress to define that term, isn't its doing so by statute in effect (per the argument made in this post) making EVERYONE a "naturalized" citizen?

9 posted on 01/11/2016 5:01:18 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy (What good is a constitution if you don't have a country to go with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim
The question is a relatively easy one to resolve as a matter of law.

Those who come to the opposite conclusion, finding Cruz to be NBC, must resort to the framework of a citizen being either naturalized (meaning going through some procedure) or not, and if they don't have to go through a procedure (if the statutory citizenship attaches automatically by circumstances of birth), then they are a natural born citizen. This framework sidesteps the distinction of citizen by operation of statute, and citizenship without resort to statute.

10 posted on 01/11/2016 5:02:46 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

All this Cruz birther nonsense is a complete and utter embarrassment for Free Republic. You Trumpets ought to be ashamed of yourselves.


13 posted on 01/11/2016 5:03:54 AM PST by Timber Rattler ("To hold a pen is to be at war." --Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim
The Constitution, Art. II, says in pertinant part: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;”

Since everyone who was a citizen at the time of adoption is dead we can remove the grandfather clause wording. We are left with “No Person except a natural born Citizen [...] shall be eligible to the Office of President;”

Why does the Constitution speak of “citizens” and separately of “natural born citizens”? Why is the word “natural” inserted? It is a matter of allegiance.

A person can be a “citizen” if they were citizens or subjects in some other country first but have come here and met the naturalization requirements. Also, if one is the offspring of a citizen and a non-citizen, then one is a US citizen. However, in both these cases it can be argued that the person might choose allegiance to their former country or to the country of the foreign-born parent or at least the allegiance might be considered divided. That is, there is no natural allegiance of the offspring to one or the other parent’s country. It is this divided or alienated allegiance that the Constitutional provision is designed to prohibit.

If, however, both of one’s parents are themselves US citizens, then one is a “citizen” as well as a “natural born citizen”. The “natural born citizen” is one who at birth has no natural allegiance to any other country and the Framers felt could be trusted to be loyal to the US and not act as a foreign agent. [footnote: Also, in their time, the rules of royal succession held sway throught much of the world and the Founders wished to forstall any potential claims by the crowned heads of Europe or their scions to sovereignty in the US.]

Note that native born is not the same as natural born. Native born simply refers to the place of one’s birth, i.e., one’s nativity. The term does not speak to the legal circumstances of a birth, merely to its location.

17 posted on 01/11/2016 5:05:05 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

I’m a natural born citizen, having been born to US citizens in the state of MN. My daughter was born in Toronto Canada, and has a Canadian birth certificate, and is eligible for Canadian citizenship. My wife was not a US citizen at that time. When my wife became a naturalized US citizen in 1973, the INS issued her a Certificate of Naturalization, at the same time, my daughter was also given a Certificate of Naturalization (she was 4 at the time).

My bet is that when Cruz’ father became naturalized, they also issued Ted a Certificate of Naturalization.

So, I’m not quite sure whether Cruz is eligible to run for president. He definitely needs to get this cleared up in a court.


19 posted on 01/11/2016 5:06:07 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

When you produce some sort of document showing he was naturalized later after birth, and not provided a US birth certificate, let’s talk again.


23 posted on 01/11/2016 5:09:05 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

Try listening to Mark Levin a true constitutional expert rather trying to pretend you are one


24 posted on 01/11/2016 5:09:39 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

Boy, Trump can really get the hornet nest all riled up.

There are lots of people buzzing around, making a lot of noise.

But there isn’t any honey there, so after a while no one cares.

Aren’t there more important things to discuss—rather than settled law.


27 posted on 01/11/2016 5:11:13 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

Martin Van Buren, our eighth president, was the first to be born in the United States. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson were not born in the United States — mainly because there was no United States when they were born.


32 posted on 01/11/2016 5:15:57 AM PST by Puzzleman ("Nothing turns out to be so oppressive and unjust as a feeble government. " -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

The author fails in his second sentence. All actions of the US government are governed by laws. Those laws laws come from acts of Congress. Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution enumerate Congress with the “Rules of Naturalization”.

The scope of those rules are not limited. The rules include who needs to be naturalized and the rules include who does not need to be naturalized.

The current expression of those rules are listed in Title 8 section 1401. Even those citizens who are born in the US are citizens at birth (Naturally born as citizens) are defined by that law.


35 posted on 01/11/2016 5:16:56 AM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim

“The whole thing with Cruz and how he’s brilliantly, by the way, dealing with these SILLY ALLEGATIONS that he’s not eligible on citizenship grounds. He’s really, really dealing with it smartly, brilliantly, I might say. The whole thing, it’s silly, it’s a distraction. But it is ILLUSTRATIVE of who’s aligned WHERE and with WHOM.
-Rush Limbaugh 1/8/16

So anti conservative Trumpkins hate on the Great One Mark Levin because he was right that Trump shouldn’t behave like a Left Wing Nutjob and troll Cruz with this ridiculous birther crap.
Now they can hate on Rush.


37 posted on 01/11/2016 5:18:53 AM PST by Happy Rain ("CRUZ 2016!!! REAL TEXAS GRIT NOT NEW YORK BULL****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim
FACT: Cruz’s father’s Cuban nationality at the time of Cruz’s birth, is irrelevant, according to the law at that time,
just so long as he was a LEGAL Immigrant at the time of Ted Cruz's birth,
AND both of Ted Cruz's parents were legally married to each other. So there is the law for the time Ted Cruz was born,
AND HOW Ted Cruz's PARENTS fulfilled ALL those requirements of the law that time, for Ted Cruz to be a "Natural Born Citizen".
Ted Cruz did NOT NEED a Court and a Judge to "Nationalize" him.

One more thing, listen to a REAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER:
38 posted on 01/11/2016 5:19:05 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joachim
This issue sets the stage for greasing a constitutional amendment through, making all citizens eligible for the office. There has been a persistent but low-level effort to do so, with Congressional resolutions to that effect. see H.J.Res. 104 in the 108th Congress for an example.

Without a "face," the people would likely oppose such an amendment. With Cruz as the face, the people would accept it.

44 posted on 01/11/2016 5:22:40 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim,

This Cruz birther thing is a blight on your forum. Every other article is some loon telling us that in their simple minded world Criz is not “qualified “ to be president.

I’m getting pretty tired of all these left wing bloggers and Donald Trump fanatics trying to undermine the election and in the end destroy the a Republic with this kind of nonsense.

Are you going to continue to allow your forum to be Birther Central?


68 posted on 01/11/2016 5:46:29 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson