Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: amorphous
Disprove any of it then - if you can!

True to form, a conspiracy-addled nutbar demands critics prove a negative.

48 posted on 01/02/2016 9:46:53 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Disprove any of it (i.e., the evidence presented in the documentary).

Btw, have a nice day! ;-)

50 posted on 01/02/2016 9:49:27 AM PST by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy; amorphous

You can’t win with a conspiracy nut because the lack of credible proof of the conspiracy is proof of how good the conspiracy truly is.

No proof means conspiracy executed flawlessly.

Little proof means standard conspiracy.

Lots of proof means misdirection to hide the true conspiracy.


98 posted on 01/02/2016 11:22:21 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson