Skip to comments.
Potential New Particle Shows Up at the LHC, Thrilling and Confounding Physicists
Scientific American ^
| December 16, 2015
| Clara Moskowitz
Posted on 12/20/2015 12:36:01 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
How does a “potential” particle “show up”?
2
posted on
12/20/2015 12:37:12 PM PST
by
o_1_2_3__
( –)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
3
posted on
12/20/2015 12:38:02 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’m waiting for them to discover evidence of time reversal.
If I’m not mistaken, there is already some tentative evidence of that, arising from neutrino research.
I believe that - if it is possible at all - time reversal and time travel will first be observed at the level of subatomic particles.
4
posted on
12/20/2015 12:38:56 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
5
posted on
12/20/2015 12:39:38 PM PST
by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It will be called the Sheldon.
6
posted on
12/20/2015 12:41:51 PM PST
by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Crash to airplanes into each other at high speed and you’ll find new particles too.
7
posted on
12/20/2015 12:58:42 PM PST
by
Paladin2
(my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Louis Pasteur, when he was fooling with bacteria, noticed that there must be something smaller than bacteria. Later, viruses were discovered when improved microscopes could see them.
8
posted on
12/20/2015 12:59:35 PM PST
by
Slyfox
(Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Crash two airplanes into each other at high speed and you’ll find new particles too.
9
posted on
12/20/2015 12:59:52 PM PST
by
Paladin2
(my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wouldn't it be funny if what they were doing caused a new type of particle to come into being? I.e., they actually created it?
To: Paladin2
Crash to airplanes into each other at high speed and youâll find new particles too. That's true, but the "new particles" will just be rearrangements of the original atoms that made up the airplane. Not one single atom of the airplane will be destroyed, and not one single new atom will be created.
In the case of the particles created by the LHC, the protons and neutrons of atoms are being ripped apart into the quarks that comprise them, and these are then reassembling in new ways, ways that (in some cases) are so unstable they only exist for an interval of time that's less than the amount of time it takes for light to cross the diameter of a proton.
11
posted on
12/20/2015 1:11:40 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Very interesting. If true it would be something new under the sun for physics theory. Later in the article it says that to-date no theory paper has predicted this particle.
If the LHC truly has seen a new particle, however, the question looming large is: What is it? From its signature at the LHC, the particle must weigh roughly 750 giga-electron volts (GeV), around 750 times the mass of the proton, and would fall into the class of bosons, meaning its spin has an integer value. Some theorists say the newcomer looks like a heavier cousin of the Higgs boson, which similarly first showed up at the LHC as a highly intriguing blip in the data about four years ago. Or it could be a kind of portal particle into the dark matter sectorâbecause this particle decays almost immediately, on its own it cannot account for the invisible matter that seems to be ubiquitous in space, but it may be a messenger that communicates with the dark matter particle, theorists suggested. Another hypothetical alternative is that it is a graviton, the predicted carrier particle for the force of gravity.
12
posted on
12/20/2015 1:13:06 PM PST
by
Oceander
To: Steely Tom
What do you mean by “time reversal?”
13
posted on
12/20/2015 1:13:20 PM PST
by
IronJack
To: 2ndDivisionVet
After the “faster than light neutrino” debacle, I’ll wait until they reproduce and verify the results.
14
posted on
12/20/2015 1:13:25 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
After the “faster than light neutrino” debacle, I’ll wait until they reproduce and verify the results.
15
posted on
12/20/2015 1:13:32 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: IronJack
What do you mean by âtime reversal?â Evidence of reversal of the arrow of time.
Evidence of an effect occurring before its cause.
I'm not saying it's true, or that it will be discovered.
I'm just saying that if it is ever discovered, it will first be seen in some phenomenon that occurs at the level of interactions of subatomic particles and the forces that mediate their interactions.
16
posted on
12/20/2015 1:19:43 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Somebody screwed up the grounding or shielding. But should be worth more government grants or funding.
17
posted on
12/20/2015 1:24:55 PM PST
by
SgtHooper
(Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Someone found Romney’s Severe Conservatism?
That IS amazing!
To: Steely Tom
I agree with you that if it ever happens, it will be in some obscure mathematical circumstance that only a physicist would understand. But I cannot fathom it ever manifesting in the “time travel” types of scenarios common in science fiction. It is simply not possible to unshatter a glass.
19
posted on
12/20/2015 1:40:51 PM PST
by
IronJack
To: o_1_2_3__
How does a âpotentialâ particle âshow upâ?Have any freeloading relatives?
20
posted on
12/20/2015 1:49:32 PM PST
by
Stentor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson