Posted on 12/05/2015 6:50:44 AM PST by McGruff
Conservative Review is run by the guy who threatened—outright THREATENED—Trump with dire consequences for talking about the *facts* in Ben Carson’s book. The FACTS according to Carson.
You think I am going to just forget that? Just let bygones be bygones?
Did the same party THREATEN people who talked about the facts in Dreams from my Father?
If not, why not? If it’s a sin to mention the facts according to Carson, why is it not a sin to mention the facts according to Obama?
I get that Conservative Review is all in for Cruz. I just don’t get a supposed conservative THREATENING the Republican frontrunner simply for mentioning the things Carson wrote/admitted himself.
I think they are extremely talented and perceptive. Their rant against the Black clergy who refused to endorse Trump is unadulterated genius.
You lost me on “I think”...
You troll.
Thanks for that speculation. It sounds right to me.
No problem, it was the typical Trump-basher you were dealing with. Not worth your time!
Go Trump and the awesome Trump supporters here!
250,000 for beach front property in a court case to obtain her land via eminent domain would qualify I think.the land is next to Trumps casino and across from the amusement park pier. That property is priceless.
Trump was an ass on that deal, no way around it. But on the other widows case Trump was a hero! I would have been far happierr if the one he saved came in his later years and the one he lost the suit to was the 1986 case.
Either way, Trump is a mixed bag. I will not vote the lesser evil, I feel that is betraying my duty in voting. But I also do not think Trump is evil, shady or selfish perhaps, but far from evil.
The Democrats are simply evil from their track record.
Vera Coking claimed the 250,000.00 figure. Trump’s then president said the actual figure was far higher. If you have an OBJECTIVE source to back your figure, please cite it. Otherwise, stop asking me to believe the Trump-hating side of the issue sans evidence.
See prior links. If objective is up to you alone to decide, perhaps it is a fools errand to continue to search. The fact that Trump even entered the court to obtain land for his Casino under eminent domain laws in the first place is I feel objective enough. All you are doing is proving my assertion that Trump is a white Obama, his followers worship his words and ignores his actions.
Trump clearly showed a dangerous propensity to abuse power, and denial on your part of the obvious will not make it any less of a red flag.
Does this entirely disqualify him? I don’t think so, but people acting like you are here scare me. I hope people are paying attention to the details, not just cheering on a hero.
For balance I have heard disquieting things about Cruz’s wife’s connections with NWO groups. Nobody is perfect, I just desire a serious conversation of the candidates character. It in the end will influence things more than a thousand promises.
I don’t know anything about that. Go hate on the guy if you want. The links at the site were to other news site, if I remember correctly. Ok, you don’t like CR (I almost never read it) and you don’t like CNN and you don’t like MSNBC or the Wash. Post. I don’t either. I get it but deal with what Trump has stated on these issues.
He was interviewed by Larry King. Is Trump for corporate bail outs? He says he was. The Wash. Post link was about eminent domain. Trump has used eminent domain to his advantage - at least it looks like it, yes/no? The Nat. Review article was about tax breaks Trump received as a developer. It looks like crony capitalism. Was it? Did Trump see a good deal and jumped on it - is he just looking out for #1? Another article was about the TARP bank bailouts - and his comments sure make him look like a pragmatist. Doesn’t bother you? Not interested? I am. I want to know who I’m voting for and what I’m getting. I believe our nation is at the brink and I want the best guy for the job and so far I’m not so sure Donald Trump is that guy. He totally owns the media and he single handedly has forced a change in the narrative of the left (at least put them on the defense) and they can’t touch him. That’s wonderful! It truly is. But he seem very non-specific on policy. That bothers me. I’m supposed to be content with, “I’ll build a wall, I can deal with Putin and China, we’ll create lots of jobs, trust me I’m going to be great! I can do it! It’ll be fun!” That might be ok for some people but I want to know a few more specifics. In other words, does this guy have core values that inform his decisions other than for business deals? He’s for abortion and now he’s not. He’s ok with homosexuals marrying. How can you have say you support strong marriages, which Trumps says he’s for, and at the same time be for something that is going to destroy marriage as it has been for thousands of years? He just doesn’t seem to have an anchor for his soul to me.
This is far too time consuming. You should know what an objective source is. But if I must...
If there are two parties in a dispute, neither is objective. Both have their version, but it is simply that—their version.
An objective source is a trustworthy third party. A court filing, for example.
None of your prior links went to a disinterested but trustworthy third party. In fact, you have no such source.
So stop wasting my time.
I don’t hate the guy. I just don’t believe one word he says about Trump. If he said Trump was wearing a red tie, I wouldn’t believe it without proof. Levin has shown his true colors. I’m fine that he’s for Cruz. I just don’t trust him At All when it comes to Trump.
Trump’s core values are, what’s best for the USA. He is first and foremost a patriot. It’s been so long since we’ve had a totally, unabashedly pro-American POTUS, people have forgotten what it’s like. It would be a seismic shift, to have such a POTUS after Obama. But it’s what we need.
Here’s a specific. Trump will get rid of TPP immediately. That is a devastating deal, all downside for the US. Those who enabled TPA enabled TPP. They didn’t have America’s best interests at heart. Trump will reverse that—and not a moment too soon.
“This isn’t a football game, its our future, be wise with your vote. Please.”
By voting for Trump, we will be; by voting for someone else, you won’t be wise, not at all. We are all cheering for a winner; obviously you prefer to back a loser.
I don’t disagree with any of that.
Here’s a link you might be interested in. I found it interesting and learned a few things as well.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Donald_Trump.htm
That is a very good link. Thanks for hunting it up and calling my attention to it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.