[NaturalBornConservative]

If you want your piece to be taken seriously as sober analysis instead of partisan hectoring, you can avoid that.

Which part of that was partisan? Which part was hectoring? And, which of the people you named is Hispanic? Or is the Latino Vote a moot point?

[Dr. Sivana]

Which part of that was partisan? Which part was hectoring? And, which of the people you named is Hispanic? Or is the Latino Vote a moot point?

First there's Senator Ted Cruz, who might have a better shot if he used his real name,



The partisan and the hectoring comes in with asides about his nickname rather than discussing his tax proposal. At no point did you say he might do better because his formal name is more Hispanic sounding. You gave no reason at all why he should not use the informal name that he has used for all of his adult life. I think Latinos will know he's Cuban whether he goes by Ted or Rafael.

If you wanted to make a point about the Latino vote, you could have made it clear, or better yet place it in another post.