Posted on 11/13/2015 1:23:19 PM PST by Sean_Anthony
“College is free, but it will be paid for with the money Obama is spending on globull warming initiatives.”
And with funds that go to planned patricide.
Cavuto has far more patience than I.
Valley-girl logic vs. financial wizard.
Rpeal 0bamaCare and there’s another shipload of money. Maybe build a wall with it.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/keelymullen
According to her resume, she went to private school at the Francis W. Parker school in Chicago.
That would be out of the means of even an upper middle class family at $35,000 a year.
He didn’t destroy her stance, but she was embarrassed and her stance eroded.
The key point, which slipped by under-stated, was that to tax “the rich 1%” at 100% would only garner $1T, which isn’t enough for her demands - much less all the other “entitlements” currently under-funded.
Your main point remains: positions have been chosen, and on the whole won’t change until there are all-out ... festivities ... to eliminate one side or the other.
I watched the video for about 30 seconds. In that short time she had several “movements” which along with the sing-song voice caused me to click off.
I have a suspicion that Ms. Mullen might have stolen the oxygen that fills the balloon atop her shoulders.
Thanks very much. I will bump for later. Thanks!
The wholesale ignorance was hard to watch.
Not to mention that each sentence ended with a “?”.
But Cavuto was kind, yet masterful, in exposing the idiocy.
She tried to claim that there was STILL a 1% rich class in Greece that can fix things there.......she is delusional.
That was a key fail on her part: the notion that there will ALWAYS be a “top 1% which can pay for all of this”, not grasping his point that if you take enough from them they’ll quit earning anything taxable.
Such people seem to believe that money is a perpetual natural resource, just there for the taking (contending that “the rich” are just taking more than their fair share). They don’t grasp that wealth is variable and perishable, that if you take away the incentive to create it then (A) people stop creating it, and (B) what exists gradually decays.
I think Neil Cavuto went too far this time. His ratings are going to plunge, and his whole show will implode soon.
[[Cavuto didn’t change any minds with this interview. Anyone who watched it just got their position reinforced]]
Yeah but it was fun to watch an idiot get put in her place- even if she was too dull of mind to understand what he was saying
Bfl
The Twit, on the other hand probably left that interview sobbing uncontrollably over the "hostile environment" she was subjected to. After all, in her twisted little mind, these ideas of hers are so valuable that they should not be challenged in any way. She'll probably demand his show be cancelled and Cavuto be fired or jailed for daring to doubt her brilliance and to place her into a situation where she no longer feels safe.
Not each sentence ended in a question mark inflection, although many did.
She spoke often in “upspeak”, with every sentence. (The emphasis on the last word going “upward”.
I think the sentences ending with a ? mark, or upspeak are a hybrid of Valley Girl speak.
At least it’s intelligible, albeit annoying, yet doesn’t lend much credibility to the speaker.
I know this is trite, while the world is spinning out of control and in grave danger. But I at least can get my arms around this, and off my chest.
LOL!
Exactly.
Our side still clings to the "appeal to logic" tactic. It doesn't work. It worked 20 years ago. Not anymore.
We're dealing with a whole new breed of Liberal.
Appealing to logic is OK, but you have to A T T A C K at some point.
Our side never attacks. Our side just philosophizes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
