Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Mentally Unstable’ Obama Looking To Start A War With China?
The Economic Collapse Blog.com ^ | October 28, 2015 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 10/29/2015 9:53:24 AM PDT by amorphous

This week, Barack Obama sent a guided missile destroyer into disputed waters in the South China Sea to see if the Chinese would start shooting at it. Yes, this is what he actually did. Fortunately for us, the Chinese backed down and did not follow through on their threats to take military action. Instead, the Chinese have chosen to respond with very angry words. The Chinese ambassador to the United States, Cui Tiankai, says that what Obama did was “a very serious provocation, politically and militarily.” And as you will see below, a state-run newspaper stated that China “is not frightened to fight a war with the US in the region”. So why in the world would Obama provoke the Chinese like this? Yes, the Chinese claims in the South China Sea are questionable. But there are other ways to resolve things like this. My friend Rick Wiles began his radio broadcast yesterday by suggesting that these kinds of actions show that Barack Obama has become “mentally unstable”, and I would have to agree. You don’t risk military confrontations that could potentially spark World War III unless you have a really good reason to do so.

The Global Times is a Chinese state-run newspaper that has very close ties to the Communist party. After Obama’s provocation in the South China Sea, it published an editorial entitled “After the show, it’s time for US destroyer to leave“. The following is the most alarming portion of that editorial…

(Excerpt) Read more at theeconomiccollapseblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: china; obama; russia; southchinasea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: amorphous
Barack Obama sent a guided missile destroyer into disputed waters in the South China Sea to see if the Chinese would start shooting at it.

Maybe he really wants to give them a guided missile destroyer so they can strip it of our latest naval technology, and is using the threat of war as cover for the Chinese to seize the ship?

Remember when the Chinese downed an American EP-3 intelligence plane in 2001? How do we know that Obama doesn't want the Chinese to get their hands on this ship, too?

-PJ

21 posted on 10/29/2015 10:24:50 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

The only downside I can see to Communist China becoming a radioactive swamp is where in the world will Wal Mart get more junk to fill their shelves?


22 posted on 10/29/2015 10:28:17 AM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Similar to their stance with North Korea, the LAST thing China wants is war with the US!

Why build up your economy, to senselessly abort it a few weeks from term?

The Chinese may be a lot of things, buy aren't aren't dumb.

23 posted on 10/29/2015 10:31:13 AM PDT by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
I'm for doing FON exercises. Just not inside 12 mile internationally recognized limits even if it is disputed territory. If China has broken international laws by building man made islands in international waters, that would be something to be settled at UN, not the high seas with weapons loaded and O in the oval office, IMHO.

On the one hand, this administration quickly points to UN authority when it comes to its desire to implement internal regulations on say gun control, global warming, sustainability, etc. But when it comes to other countries, this administration wants to unilaterally force its will. Something is screwed up here, if you ask me.

24 posted on 10/29/2015 10:31:40 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

LOL!


25 posted on 10/29/2015 10:33:16 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Thorliveshere
tiny conspiracy side of me says that it’s on purpose

You're not alone. ;-)

26 posted on 10/29/2015 10:34:27 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Freedom of navigation. Ever hear of Libya?


27 posted on 10/29/2015 10:39:14 AM PDT by ryan71 (Bibles, Beans and Bullets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Obama doesn’t know what to do about China.

There’s no black people there, there’s no Muslims to speak of. There are no long-standing American-leftist narratives to guide him there. They are communists, but his political roots and certainly his leftist base and labor aren’t particularly fond of China.

As such, his ideological glasses, through which he must process everything, just don’t work.

China probably understands this. In light of that, you can argue that China could have been even much more aggressive over these past 8 years than they have been.


28 posted on 10/29/2015 10:39:16 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
War with China would be a disaster to "Free Trade", why the USA may have to start making things again! catastrophe!....

The USA is not going to start "making things again" probably ever. The leftist unions, minimum wage morons and anti-capitalist socialists in charge of running and ruining the nation will make damned sure of that. It's all about creating dependency upon foreign goods and destroying us from within for these leftists.... and then of course, blaming capitalism for the resultant destruction.

29 posted on 10/29/2015 10:41:37 AM PDT by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

I would want one who takes American interests seriously. soebarkah ain’t it. More likely this had something to do with Indonesia’s national stake in the region. Not ours.


30 posted on 10/29/2015 10:44:23 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: XenaLee

Banksters and others who put obama in are trying to start a major war. War is good for bussiness... /s


31 posted on 10/29/2015 10:44:35 AM PDT by doomtrooper99 (Mr Truman, you did not finish the job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
Startling: A European Country Reportedly Believes Obama Is ‘Mentally Unwell,’ Asks About Impeachment!

You mean there's still some question about that??  photo Madmen copy_zps4tqb70sd.jpg

32 posted on 10/29/2015 11:01:27 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
He is not mentally unstable.

He has an agenda.

Contrary to popular opinion, psychopaths are not crazy or unstable.

He is doing everything without registering any motion on his conscience meter.

Obama is a man with a plan and he is working it to the letter.

33 posted on 10/29/2015 11:11:50 AM PDT by Slyfox (Will no one rid us of this meddlesome president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

“Contrary to popular opinion, psychopaths are not crazy or unstable.”

You must mean sociopaths. Psychopaths are most definitely crazy and unstable.


34 posted on 10/29/2015 11:18:57 AM PDT by rhoda_penmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Its not internationally recognized they have no one that recognizes this artificial island except the communist chinese. This need to be done or it set a dangerous precedent. The law is not on their side.


35 posted on 10/29/2015 11:20:32 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
This makes perfect sense.

Zero hates the US military and wants do destroy it.

Zero hates the Chinese because the Chinese understand the threat of Islam, and are doing something about it.

For him, a Muslim, what better scenario, than having a war with China and perhaps Russia?

He gets to see the weakening and/or destruction of all the non-Muslim major militaries.

Then his ISIS pals can step in and conquer what's left.

36 posted on 10/29/2015 11:21:47 AM PDT by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

The UN is worthless and never settles anything of value without the US doing the heavy lifting. Surely you dont put faith in the UN its an anti-US and anti-Israel organization.


37 posted on 10/29/2015 11:21:52 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor
The only downside I can see to Communist China becoming a radioactive swamp is where in the world will Wal Mart get more junk to fill their shelves?

ROFLMAO! Very funny.

38 posted on 10/29/2015 11:30:58 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: XenaLee
Corporations made plenty of money when they made things in the USA. The off shoring trend was to increase profits and not create them were none existed. So offshoring has a few winners, the stock holders for one and many, many losers. The myth that the reduced production cost is passed on to the consumer is just that, a myth. The difference in the average per unit cost in production is 4 cents on the dollar. That's all. Quality has suffered because engineering is minimal and materials are generally cheap. We have many people idle while this unforced de industrialization continues.

Right now unions only represent 10% of the manufacturing workers in America, not significant. The off shored factory has a 90% chance of being non - union.

Wise up, and question the anti US gloBULList propaganda.

39 posted on 10/29/2015 12:09:03 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
There are many things worth going to war over, like actual impedance of navigation, invading hordes, second amendment, private property, life, freedom, Israel, attacks against ourselves or allies, and etc. A sand castle that we're not even sure if it is lawful or unlawful under international law, and that is not actually impeding navigation, IMO, isn't an issue worth starting WWIII over.

If the UN can't play a role in making a determination and ruling on something as simple as this, and which has multinational interest, what the hell good is the UN?

My other point was: why is this administration so quick to take our country's internal matters before the world court, but not this? Seems counter intuitive to me. But that's just me FRiend.

40 posted on 10/29/2015 12:33:33 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson