Ordinarily it would be wrong to corner the child of a public figure in this way, however, since her book is targeted to young people, the question about her father was warranted.
The question as to who her real father is seemed inappropriate IMO.
Not to mention she makes several hundred thousand a year working for CSFF...... clinton slush fund foundation.
I agree, she’s a public figure and connected to the Clinton Foundation so questions about her father’s behaviour are, just about, acceptable.
The paternity question was utterly offensive and should not have been asked.
Nothing is inappropriate in confronting these pathetic excuses for humans. Have they held to any “rule” which is “inappropriate?” No, there are no “rules” as they are above them all. So you are supporting political correctness for the Clintons? This family should have been tarred and feathered long ago. Instead, they continue to spread their lies in our face and shove their lawlessness to this nation and everyone that comes into contact with them. When will the country see the end of this crap and be done with them?
If it looks like a duck,
If it walks like a duck
If it quacks like a duck
,
Then Chelsea is a Hubble.