> They love that many have been conditioned get their definition of marriage from however the state happens to be defining it at any one time.
I don’t think that’s entirely accurate. Until the USSC action there was recognition of the definition of marriage, a definition which has been recognized for millenia. That recognition protected and favored families, which serves the societal need for the continuation of society.
The illicit action of the USSC is a war on society. The minds of those “justices” are clouded and dark.
No fault divorce wasn’t recognized for millennia. That went a long way for folks being conditioned take the state’s version of marriage as the actual version. And all that is in the modern era is a state contract which can be broken and resumed with the state’s permission between any parties the state currently deems acceptable. And what the state accepts is only what judges, pols, or the voting public accepts at any one time. That’s all it ever will be to the state in the modern era, it doesn’t have any other way to do it.
In any case, I can’t see leftists or the state ever allowing it’s control of marriage to slip away. Those religious groups that accepted ‘gay marriage’ wouldn’t even marry their own gay members until the state they happened to be in agreed with them about it.
Freegards