Whatever?
… Instead of name-calling how about reason, facts, logic?
Whatever?
… Instead of name-calling how about reason, facts, logic?
[[how about reason, facts, logic?]]
find me someone who is reasonable, factual and logical to argue the points with, and I will- someone who can at least understand the points brought up- without launching into liberal nonsense that has nothing to do with the points brought up-
[[Yes I am advocating birth control both as a measure of population control]]
oh, and find me someone who isn’t a flaming liberal too while you’re at it- I suppose a libertarian would be semi-ok to argue with, but not much better-
[[for me to make that allegation would be illogical.]]
Now you’re catching on- the first step to recovery is to admit you have a problem
[[Let us stop this name-calling]]
But apparently it’s ok for Nathan to use the words ‘conservative’ in a pejorative manner- another fairly typical liberal argument ‘tactic’ (Do as I say, not as I do)
Whatever liberal
The points already brought up stand- We are Not overpopulated- Not even close- and to continue stating we are shows nothing but stubborn obstinance, and a mind hell bent on parroting the usual liberal drivel we see on sites such a hufpo and democratic underground- So, like they say- “if the shoe fits...”-
[[and as a matter of natural human right]]
what ‘right’ would that be? Your ‘right’ to demand sterilization? You ‘right’ to demand people not enjoy a family? You ‘right’ to demand that couples use birth control?
I’m having a little trouble understanding your ‘natural human right’ here- Apparently you think natural human right really means ‘rights according to nathanbedford’ (Which apparently are much much higher than the Rights afforded man by God