Posted on 09/28/2015 8:04:50 PM PDT by annalex
If you want to be on this right wing, monarchy, paleolibertarianism and nationalism ping list, but are not, please let me know. If you are on it and want to be off, also let me know. This ping list is not used for Catholic-Protestant debates.
It is because the globalists are out to destroy the folks that would put up the most resistamce to them. Smart enough and industrious enough to if they wake up and see what is going on. Plus they wipe out many christians at the same time so that’s a big plus for them too.
It would be helpful to her case if she got the name of the founder of the ACLU correct - Roger Nash Baldwin
Alex Baldwin is a misspelling of the drinking, loudmouth actor and hollywood lefty, Alec Baldwin.
Margaret Sanger was a bit of a whore in her younger days.
“Yulia Latynina is known for her sharp and polemic statements. She claimed that Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, French President Jacques Chirac, Chancellor of Germany Gerhard Schröder, and U.S. President George W. Bush have all been successfully “recruited” by Vladimir Putin to serve his political objectives”
Stupid article from a stupid russky
Interesting
That doesn’t surprise me. The whole thing appears very hastily written. Nevertheless, the general drift is correct.
All of this verbiage is unnecessary. Economic migrants from failed Muslim nations are showing up in Western Europe because Western Europe offers them financial benefits simply for showing up. These people don’t want to be in Hungary or Poland - they want to get to Germany or France or the UK. Stop offering people incentives to come and they’ll stop coming.
From my limited knowledge of him, I did not. He seems another typical early 20th century "progressive." Full of hypocrisy. Praised the Soviet Union and Stalin up and down. If he had said half of what he said about the Soviet Union in defense of Hitler, he would have been jailed.
And 3 thousand not 3 million died in the twin towers.
Pretty simplistic and limited analysis, Alex.
Take up the White Man’s burden—
Send forth the best ye breed—
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives’ need;
To wait in heavy harness,
On fluttered folk and wild—
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half-devil and half-child.
Take up the White Man’s burden—
In patience to abide,
To veil the threat of terror
And check the show of pride;
By open speech and simple,
An hundred times made plain
To seek another’s profit,
And work another’s gain.
Take up the White Man’s burden—
The savage wars of peace—
Fill full the mouth of Famine
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly
Bring all your hopes to nought.
Take up the White Man’s burden—
No tawdry rule of kings,
But toil of serf and sweeper—
The tale of common things.
The ports ye shall not enter,
The roads ye shall not tread,
Go mark them with your living,
And mark them with your dead.
Take up the White Man’s burden—
And reap his old reward:
The blame of those ye better,
The hate of those ye guard—
The cry of hosts ye humour
(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:—
“Why brought he us from bondage,
Our loved Egyptian night?”
Take up the White Man’s burden—
Ye dare not stoop to less—
Nor call too loud on Freedom
To cloke (1) your weariness;
By all ye cry or whisper,
By all ye leave or do,
The silent, sullen peoples
Shall weigh your gods and you.
Take up the White Man’s burden—
Have done with childish days—
The lightly proferred laurel, (2)
The easy, ungrudged praise.
Comes now, to search your manhood
Through all the thankless years
Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom,
The judgment of your peers!
- Rudyard Kipling
Bravo!
He should have been jailed.
The difference between a historian and a recorder of events is that a historian sees primary reasons behind the “offering people incentives to come”, and a recorder of events sees “unnecessary verbiage”.
For example, why Britain of early 1900 did not offer incentives for the migrants to come and a century later it does?
Or why colonial Middle East was a well cultivated happy place (Lebanon was known as a “second Paris” and now it is in a state of unending civil war?
Was Islam less of Islam a century ago?
That, by the way, is a judgment on the brokenness of our political discourse.
It looks like a drunken tirade rather than analysis (it is worse in Russian). However, it touches upon ideas that lately people are afraid to touch if they want to continue publishing their thoughts. Such, for example, is the idea that a fundamental revision of the assumptions under neo-colonialism is needed; also a lot more history needs to be examined behind our liberal “institutions”.
The silent, sullen peoples
Shall weigh your gods and you.
Still true.
A lot more history in general needs to be examined, especially about the Mediterranean world. It’s a complex, very long history not well sited to the idiocy which passes for public/political discussion in the West these days; nothing simple about it. For example, notwithstanding their at least nominal Mohammedanism, the Palestinians and even more so the Syrians, are Hellenistic people. I remember talking with a Palestinian fellow many years ago who remarked to me that his people were the Byzantines left behind when the rest of us lit out as the Arabs and their Mohammedanism showed up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.