Posted on 09/07/2015 1:54:20 PM PDT by Ray76
Will insults conservatives by saying this. Davis, could have been found in contempt, and fined without being thrown in jail. The judge overstepped his bounds by creating a political prisoner. I think Anthony Kennedy is a jerk, and more concerned about himself, and his legacy, what ever that is, than the constitution.. In the end, the supreme court ruled, and because they have been whittling down the 10th amendment, we have less and less chance to fight them without something like Levin’s liberty amendments. As it is now, the 10th amendment has lost most of its weight. Will has shown himself for what he is, and by insulting Davis supporters, which I don’t consider myself, BTW, he cheapens the debate to nothing more than name calling, a leftist tactic.
What has happened to George Will? He used to be relatively normal. He has turned into a complete looney-tune.
George Will Compares Kim Davis to Segregationist George Wallace
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Eccl 10:2 compares George Will to a lukewarm cup of coffee.
I spit him out of my mouth.
Well why not! Gay marriage is law of the land now. Nothing stopping the two from revealing their true selves.
LOL!
I disliked his just a little less when he was pontification about baseball. He should have stayed there. It was belly, belly good for him...
This is the most intelligent post in this thread. I’m not crazy about Will, but I don’t see the point of misinterpreting his words.
It’s a lame attempt to smear.
I never did like Will.
I was sitting in the RF Bleachers in game 4 of the 63 Series. His HR was one for the ages. In fair territory in the Orange level.
Is everyone gay all of a sudden?
What is going on? Why is everyone flipping their lid?
I will watch the rebroadcast this evening. This is an extremely repulsive comment by the Perrier Conservative.
I guess Will has been doing a lot of “evolving” lately. The entire human race has decided to “evolve” into homosexuals.
I agree. Will does sound senile.
Will needs to just pack it in and head to the house. He’s done.
Earth to George Will. Two women or two men do not match up sexually. They may be able to do whatever it is they do to have their mutual whatever, but it is not the same thing as a heterosexual union.
As Reagan said: “Society has always regarded marital love as a sacred expression of the bond between a man and a woman. It is the means by which families are created and society itself is extended into the future. In the Judeo-Christian tradition it is the means by which husband and wife participate with God in the creation of a new human life. It is for these reasons, among others, that our society has always sought to protect this unique relationship. In part the erosion of these values has given way to a celebration of forms of expression most reject. We will resist the efforts of some to obtain government endorsement of homosexuality.” — President Ronald Reagan, July 12, 1984
As the first Republican Platform said: 1856 - The new Republican party selected for its national platform a call to abolish the “Twin Relics of Barbarism, Slavery and Polygamy.” —just add homosexuality to update it.
There is nothing to compare. They are not the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.