“...The Constitution is not a dictionary...”
You are correct! The courts are where any vagueness is decided. So, if you can just point me to a court precedent defining presidential qualifications regarding birthright citizenship (natural born or otherwise)... Local... County... State... Federal? Anything outside your and my opinions?
Not immigration cases. Immigration cases have no bearing on Presidential qualifications, unless the court precedent determining presidential qualifications either qualifies or disqualifies a candidate based on immigration law...
Here, I’ll save you the effort: IT DOESN’T MATTER. Let’s say you come up with an ironclad argument that can not be refuted. Who is going to do anything about it? What office of appropriate jurisdiction has shown the slightest interest in disqualifying any Presidential candidate *ever*?
What are *you* going to do about it? Fuss? Fume? walk around waving a sign?
Here’s what *I’m* going to do, and what every other responsible voter is going to do: look at the candidates on the ballot and vote for whoever we think is best. Period.
You don’t have to like it. But you may want to find some way to live with it, otherwise all that unrequited self-righteousness is going to burn you up.
BTW.... I'm providing facts and defending the Constitution. You are the one fussing and fuming and advocating treason. Shame on you.