I disagree. This shows the public exactly why cops shoot "unarmed" people. He took one for the team. Maybe now the media (if they have *any* intelligence whatsoever) will give the benefit of the doubt to the cop.
And yes--I do know they have no intelligence. But maybe the public does
Maybe now the media (if they have *any* intelligence whatsoever) will give the benefit of the doubt to the cop.
Dream on
If by “took one for the team”, you meant “let a violet felon gain control and use of his firearm”, then yes.
you are 100% correct in that it shows WHY a cop can and should shoot an unarmed aggressive suspect
And that’s what he should have done.