As a consequence, even if the burden of proof remains to cold fusionists to experimentally prove, at least, they are right, on a theoretical point of view, I completely revert the burden of proof to orthodox physicists who now will have to prove the non-existence of cold fusion, if they can, since they have been claiming it for years if not decades.
How can anyone be "right" on a theoretical point of view? Indeed, you can't be wrong on a theoretical point of view, but the only way to certify you are right, is to prove it, making it a fact, not a theory.
Yeah, this guy seems to have the scientific method backwards. Without experimental evidence, he can’t even have a “theory”. At best, he has a hypothesis, and hypotheses are a dime a dozen.