We’ve gone well beyond any moral “gray area” at this point.
For example, there’s no point in taking some moral stance that cloning humans for medical purposes, like harvesting organs, is wrong if we are already killing regular humans for medical purposes like harvesting organs. Right now, we’re essentially saying, as a society, that theoretical cloned humans have more rights than actual living humans. That’s how morally unhinged we have become, because we’ve accept the liberal arguments about “subjective morality”, “situational ethics”, and such.
I think things will get a lot worse than cannibalism, simply because we are more inventive, so we’re bound to come up with more interesting ways to debase and degrade human life in the name of some godless idol of the humanists.
When we let them drag us into the politics of the argument, we have already lost. They can beat us to death with circumstances and purposes. We have to stay in the arena of is it ethical, is it moral? NO. They must then live with their choice and if I have a moral absolute against subsidizing it then if the government funds it, they are violating my constitutional rights. Right?
May I ask you to elaborate on your interesting post?