Posted on 07/17/2015 7:39:22 PM PDT by smoothsailing
Absolutely, couldn't agree more.
Haha This is the Same agency that tried to get the public to believe all those border jumpers from last summer were going to show up for hearings after being turned lose for months or years? WTF do think they are kidding.
Even senators Flake and Juan McCain admit that 90% of these people are skipping the court hearings they agreed to attend.
These people are long gone, hiding in safe houses somewhere else. They know the only resolve the feds have is in preventing states from defending themselves from these scofflaw “undocumented immigrants” introduced into their states/rammed down their throats by Obama & Co.
If DHS officials know which doors to knock on then they should be deporting the illegals they find.
Sure, gringo, we've got your work permits, right here.
> “ Otherwise, the Court intends to utilize all available powers to compel compliance, Judge Hanen wrote.”
Ive followed this case since late last year.
There is a lot that a federal judge can do that would astonish most people.
Judge Hanen already expressed hesitancy to impose monetary sanctions against DOJ Attorneys who lied to him because in effect the penalties would be borne by the taxpayers and theres no justice in that.
I will get to a very astonishing option of receivership but first want to write about timing and also the DOJ Attorneys who lied to the Judge.
I imagine the DOJ Attorneys are trembling over their careers. A disbarment order by Judge Hanen means their careers are over (their career trajectory is already on a downward arc) and there is nothing that Obama or anyone can do about it in terms of preserving their law degrees and careers. So disbarment is a big deal but not near as big a deal as receivership which Ill get to in a moment.
The thing to keep in mind is the clock and the calendar which I will also write about in a moment. This case is about Obamas lawlessness and his goal of getting millions and millions of illegals registered to vote and to vote democrat in the 2016 elections Thus, clock, calendar, timing of this court case is a strategic matter in tandem with the 2016 elections.
Consider a couple of things:
1) Obamas voter registration form leaves off a checkbox for declaring citizenship status. We all know that only citizens are legally allowed to vote, right?
2) It was reported by a member of Congress (in March I think it was) that there is a loophole in Obamas executive amnesty forms in that an illegal may be coached to say that he or she has been in the USA for longer than 5 years so that they can claim immediate citizenship eligibility thereby appearing legal for registering to vote.
Between loopholes and deficient federal voter forms, Obama intends to sign up as many illegals as possible to vote democrat. We want therefore that the federal courts take their time to drag this case out until after the November 2016 elections so that massive voter fraud is restrained on this particular front.
As to the concept of receivership, I saw a press report (I am not able to find the link) where DHS Director Jeh Johnson remarked after it was discovered that more than 2000 (and possibly much more than that) DACA/DAPA applications were processed and approved after the courts order was in effect (a clear violation of the order) words to the effect it is not necessary that the Department be put under compliance by the court because he claimed that that his Department was investigating and would get to the bottom of how the violation of the court order occurred. His remark left me thinking that in his communications with Judge Hanens Federal Court that he was told that receivership was a possible part of sanctions.
What is receivership and can a court takeover a government agency or department? Yes. Here is a recent example:
Basically a receivership is a temporary arrangement whereby a Judges investigators or in this case US Marshals take over command of a department to run an investigation and monitor its performance. The department personnel all report to the Courts Master. Its a big deal.
Judge Hanen, as a federal judge can rain hell down upon anyone or any organization that crosses him. The takeaway is you do not want to mess with a federal judge ever. He has all tools at his disposal for upholding the law. This is why the DOJ attorneys who lied to him appear to be trembling.
What possibly restrains Judge Hanen now is polity towards the federal appeals court where they are getting ready to start hearings in about a week on the merits of the preliminary injunction. Hes giving a chance for that proceeding to open in orderly fashion without rocking the boat with possible receivership sanctions. And we want both he and the appellate justices to run out the clock as long as possible.
My advice....go to the top three members of DHS and lock them up in a facility until the judge’s order is met. Tell the next three guys in charge that they’ve got thirty days to meet the order or they go to the facility to join their ‘buddies’. Repeat the process each month until ‘solved’. Behind all of this game-playing....DHS has lawyers on the staff advising them. These are likely folks hired by the White House and provide advice to the leaders of the organization. I might go ahead and bring them in, and give them a month to fix their problem or suspend their license to practice law.
I have no idea of Judge Hanen’s views on guns, babies, marriage, and other essential subjects or of his age for that matter. If his views are sound and his age youthful, wouldn’t he make a great first appointment to SCOTUS by a POTUS named Cruz or Walker?
Neither has the obamites.
You have to admit that there remains a glimmer of hope thanks to this judge. ( evidently a judge who is worthy of the name.)
Every violent incident associated with this door-to-door backfill will be blood on the filthy hands of Johnson and Obama. Not that this would be anything new for either of these murderers-by-extension.
Which will make them illegal aliens, which will make them eligible for an endless parade of benefits and eligible to vote even before any path to citizenship. That’ll teach ‘em.
Did they fix by Judge Hanen’s 31 July deadline? How will he know without waiting until 19 Aug? UPDATE?
Google Judge Hanen. I’d do it for you but why should I reward your laziness?
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
Maimonides
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.