Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ought-six
That’s funny, because to get a flavor of the cause of the Civil War from dispassionate and neutral sources, one can simply read the European accounts of the conflict, both contemporary and historical.

Shouldn't we rely more on the speeches and writings of the Southern and Northern leaders of the time rather than analysis from people who were not part of it?

190 posted on 07/12/2015 7:38:32 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

“Shouldn’t we rely more on the speeches and writings of the Southern and Northern leaders of the time rather than analysis from people who were not part of it?”

Yes, let’s. You will find that most said the war was NOT about slavery. Hell, go straight to the horse’s mouth: Lincoln himself never said he waged war over slavery. Many leading Union military officers said they never would have fought the war if it had been over slavery. They were almost unanimous in saying the war was fought to “preserve the Union.”


203 posted on 07/12/2015 1:29:54 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson