If I had the opportunity to pick a stellar, fundamental subject, discussion of our time between the universally acknowledged,quintessential genius/experts in their respective fields, I would find it very difficult to choose one as perfectly matched, appropriate to the objective sought, as this particular article attempts to fulfill.
1 posted on
06/28/2015 3:47:07 AM PDT by
lbryce
To: SunkenCiv
Einstein vs Bergson, Science vs Philosophy and the Meaning of Time ping
2 posted on
06/28/2015 3:48:04 AM PDT by
lbryce
(OBAMA:Misbegotten, GodForsaken, bastard offspring of Satan and Medusa)
To: lbryce
When science and religion weren't at war.
Einstein didn't buy LaMatre's theory of an expanding universe till Hubbel proved the priest to be correct.
3 posted on
06/28/2015 4:15:08 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
To: lbryce
*bump*
The article is a good read and the sound clip is a good listen.
6 posted on
06/28/2015 4:46:19 AM PDT by
Yardstick
To: lbryce
Einstein asserted that time could only be measured by observing events, like the progression of the hands of a clock. It appears that Bergson imputed psychological time with physical significance beyond what it could support. When I started the article, I thought the Henry that Einstein was going to confront was Henri Poincaré, who came within a hairs breadth of inventing relativity, except he could not give up the psychologically grounded notions of absolute time and absolute space. Same could be said for another Henry, Hendrik Lorentz, who actually had devised the Lorentz transform, which Einstein independently reinvented. Lorentz became a friend and supporter of Einstein.
To: lbryce
10 posted on
06/28/2015 5:04:45 AM PDT by
Chainmail
(A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
To: lbryce
Star physicist Stephen Hawking even declared the end of philosophy in 2011. Yet another arrogant pronouncement by Hawking. You'd think physicists who consider the infinite scope of the universe, looking outward or inward might have a little more humility about the limit of their current knowledge.
15 posted on
06/28/2015 6:03:52 AM PDT by
Flick Lives
("I'm just a stranger in a strange land")
To: lbryce
In a theoretical nutshell this expressed perfectly the division between lived time and spacetime: subjective experience versus objective reality. Both are right. Pain or boredom makes subjectively experienced time seem to pass slowly, while fun and excitement makes time seem to pass quickly. While the objective time for both as measured by a clock are the same.That is a hypnotic trance called time distortion.
17 posted on
06/28/2015 8:29:01 AM PDT by
mjp
((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
To: lbryce
Some supporters went as far as to say that Bergsons earlier work anticipated the quantum revolution of Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg by four decades or more.Heisenberg was stopped for doing 85 in a 45mph zone. The sheriff shouted Do you know how fast you were going? Heisenberg replied, No, but I know where I am.
34 posted on
06/28/2015 6:44:39 PM PDT by
FatherofFive
(Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson