They took $10,000,000 that could have been used to help these people in Cameroon.
Posted on 06/15/2015 3:55:41 PM PDT by juliosevero
LOLOL.....You can’t tell me that wasn’t for anything more then political influence.....Africa!! That amount of money would have done a whole lot for a nation that’s in poverty had they kept it at home.
Who would have thought that Africa would ever become a key player in AMERICAN politics? What a shame.
HOW MUCH is ENOUGH?
A shake down artist of legendary and literal proportion.
So sorry for the African church. They never knew what hit them, did they? She should be sued somehow.
I must say I find this extremely difficult to understand. Clinton is not only pro-gay, but also pro-abort. And she has always backed the Muslims in their fight against Christians.
Homosexual? How about her abortion stance?
I wonder just whose money it was that was laundered through this church.
Nobody without an agenda would give $10 million to a charity, knowing that only $600,000 of it would ever be used for charitable causes
If true she’s going to have a load of explaining to do.
The gay community are not forgiving.
Boy, were those Africans taken for a ride!
It’s hard to imagine that after a Baptist Convention donates money to Miss Hillary that they’d ever get more donations from their congregations.
I would tend to believe that the church was used as a conduit for the money, not its source. This smells like money-laundering.
That's ten million dollars that that church could have used to feed the poor and help the needy.
It reminds me of the time that an organization asked Bill Clinton to help raise money for charity. They raised less than Bill's fee of $500,000, but they had to pay Bill first, before any money went to their charitable cause at all. Talk about stealing from the poor to give to the rich.
My guess is that they money came from the USA (maybe our government) and sent to the Clintons.
Any American seeking donations in Africa,,,,, is an evil POS.
They took $10,000,000 that could have been used to help these people in Cameroon.
As others have noted, this is plainly money laundering
someone is buying influence.
It was never going to the needy.
Its just a cover for someone looking for a US government favor.
Most likely someone unsavory.
A political whore, esp. one named Clinton, doesn’t care where their money comes from, as long as it comes.
Perhaps. Shame on that church for collecting money, purportedly to do God's work in Africa, and giving it to politicians in the U.S.
Still, the Clintons are even more despicable. Either they were taking money through laundering, or they were taking money from the mouths of the poor in Africa.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.