This is incoherent and illiterate. It also wants us to accept prima facie statements made concerning innocence which is what is otherwise objected to if the argument is prima facie acceptance of guilt.
I can't tell if it's illiterate but it's definitely incoherent. It seems like ifinnegan is trying to Dazzle us with brilliance.
The core question is: Why is the bail set so high?
Discussion of JP who set the one million buck bonds
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3296340/posts
Was the meeting of criminals dominated two-to-one by out-of-state bikers who have arrest records in other states?
Or does an overwhelming majority of crime-committing bikers who engage in robbery, meth running, racketeering, and murder, have zero criminal records?
Or did the cops just arrest people with zero foundation other than that they ride motorcycles and were attending a pre-announced publicized meeting in a public restaurant?
This isn't rocket science. But it is a revealer of wheat from chaff, in terms of fellow patriots.